Table 5.
Program A (n = 316) | Program B (n = 316) | p valuea | |
---|---|---|---|
N (%) | N (%) | ||
Satisfaction at 3-month follow-up | Response: 260 (82.0) | Response: 271 (85.8) | 0.58 |
Very satisfied | 64 (24.6) | 68 (25.1) | |
Somewhat satisfied | 162 (62.3) | 161 (59.4) | |
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied | 33 (12.7) | 42 (15.5) | |
Somewhat dissatisfied | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
Very dissatisfied | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
Usefulness at 3-month follow-up | Response: 259 (81.7) | Response: 272 (86.1) | 0.81 |
Very useful | 83 (32.0) | 79 (29.0) | |
Quite useful | 131 (50.6) | 138 (50.7) | |
Neither useful nor useless | 44 (17.0) | 54 (19.9) | |
Quite useless | 1 (0.4) | 1 (0.4) | |
Very useless | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | |
Usefulness at 7-month follow-up | Response: 256 (80.8) | Response: 260 (82.3) | 0.72 |
Very useful | 111 (43.4) | 115 (44.2) | |
Quite useful | 120 (46.9) | 123 (47.3) | |
Neither useful nor useless | 23 (9.0) | 22 (8.5) | |
Quite useless | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) | |
Very useless | 1 (0.4) | 0 (0.0) |
aChi-square test was conducted.