. 2021 Mar 11;100(7):101097. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101097

Table 2.

Effect of dietary feed different concentration of NH on production performance of laying hens.¹

		NH level (mg/kg)
Item		Control	100	200	400	SEM	P-Value
1–8 wk	Egg production, %	77.17	79.70	82.20	82.14	2.12	0.310
	Egg weight, g	65.16	65.62	64.73	64.81	0.06	0.703
	FCR	2.30	2.22	2.16	2.19	0.54	0.348
	ADFI,g	114.64	114.71	114.25	115.97	1.33	0.815
1–12 wk	Egg production, %	75.52^b	78.73^ab	82.39^a	82.99^a	2.00	0.050
	Egg weight, g	65.14	65.61	64.77	64.90	0.54	0.705
	FCR	2.33^a	2.21^ab	2.11^b	2.13^b	0.05	0.028
	ADFI,g	111.81	111.87	110.61	112.99	1.17	0.570

^a,b

Means with different superscripts within a column differ significantly (P < 0.05).

Each mean represents 6 replicates, with 4 eggs/replicate.

Abbreviations: 100, 100 mg/kg neohesperidin; 200, 200 mg/kg neohesperidin; 400, 400 mg/kg neohesperidin; ADFI, average daily feed intake; FCR, feed conversion ratio; NH, neohesperidin.