Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 28;40(11):e106771. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020106771

Figure EV3. Further characterization of RNA‐seq data and the tests of IL6 and Gldc on chemical reprogramming.

Figure EV3

  • A
    KEGG analysis of downregulated genes in R406‐treated reprogramming intermediates. Statistical significance was assessed by Benjamini–Hochberg method.
  • B
    Heatmap of RNA‐seq data for the normalized expression (z score) of genes involved in cytokine–cytokine receptor interaction (A).
  • C
    RT–qPCR analysis of Il6 expression in MEFs and reprogramming intermediates treated with DMSO and R406. n = 3.
  • D
    GFP+ colony number on d24 of samples treated with IL6 protein. n = 3.
  • E
    GFP+ colony number on d24 of samples treated with anti‐IL6 antibody. n = 3.
  • F
    Cell number on d4 of samples cultured in MEF medium supplemented with DMSO or R406. n = 3.
  • G
    Cell number on d4 of samples cultured in Stage 1 medium supplemented with DMSO or R406. n = 3.
  • H–L
    RT–qPCR analysis of Shmt1 and Cth gene expression after treatments of R406, shSyk, FK506, shPpp3ca, and shNfatc1 on d8 of reprogramming. n = 3.
  • M
    RT–qPCR analysis of Gldc, Cbs, Tdh, Shmt1, and Cth gene expression after R788 treatment on d8 of reprogramming. n = 3.
  • N
    Diagram showing the procedure of shGldc virus infection at the early stage of reprogramming.
  • O
    RT–qPCR analysis of Gldc expression in MEFs infected with shNC and shGldc viruses. n = 3.
  • P
    Immunofluorescence of Sall4 in shNC‐ and shGldc‐infected cells with and without R406 treatment on d12. n = 5. Scale bar, 100 μm.

Data information: All data are presented as mean ± SD. Statistical significance was assessed by the two‐tailed Student’s t‐test, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001, ****P < 0.0001.