Skip to main content
. 2021 May 6;36(21):e141. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e141

Table 2. POCUS education status and perception.

Characteristics Responders, No (%)
POCUS education (n = 392)
Education experience, yes 285 (73)
Own institutional education, yes 161 (41)
Education site (n = 277)a
SECCI workshop 193 (70)
KSEM workshop 165 (60)
Other department workshops 76 (27)
Own institution only 30 (11)
Education type (n = 278)a
Hands-on 177 (64)
Lecture 252 (91)
Review of scan results 92 (33)
Frequency of own institutional education (n = 161)
Every week 11 (7)
Every month 29 (18)
Every quarter/year 74 (46)
Irregular 47 (29)
Should POCUS be EM residency mandatory training? (n = 390)
Necessary 297 (76)
Necessary but not mandatory 92 (23)
Not required 1 (1)
Should POCUS training be provided by EM specialist? (n = 390)
Yesa (n = 237)
Because, Good understanding of special circumstances in ER 217 (92)
Can focus on teaching what is important 167 (71)
Need for fast ultrasound scans 137 (58)
Short of knowledge about other department's emergency disease 69 (29)
POCUS does not require special knowledge 49 (21)
Noa (n = 153)
No matter where 102 (67)
Because, Can learn professional content 81 (53)
More systematic education possible 54 (35)
Superior interpretation of results 33 (22)
Superior scan technique 32 (21)

POCUS = point-of-care ultrasound, SECCI = Society of Emergency and Critical Care Imaging, KSEM = Korean Society of Emergency Medicine, EM = emergency medicine, ER = emergency room.

aMultiple response questionnaire.