Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 1;21:255. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02706-z

Table 1.

The prevalence of outpatient antibiotic utilization by antibiotic combination situation, economic zone, study setting, and hospital level.

No. of studies (N) n/N Percentage (95% CI) (%)
Antibiotic combination situation (23)
 Single use of antibiotic 23 28467/36751 74.8 (68.2-81.3)
 Combined use of antibiotic 23 8284/36751 25.2 (18.7-31.8)
Economic zone (35)
 Eastern 24 74716/134667 59.8 (49.3-70.2)
 Central 4 4363/5244 80.0 (67.2-92.8)
 Western 7 5371/8540 70.0 (56.1-83.9)
Study setting (35)
 Urban 29 68961/118022 64.1 (54.4-73.8)
 Rural 6 15489/30429 63.1 (44.3-82.0)
Hospital level (35)
 Level 3 19 61551/103670 64.0 (54.9-73.0)
 Level 2 9 14214/33478 57.3 (37.1-77.6)
 Level 1 8 8658/11303 71.3 (63.0-79.6)
Study period (33)
 2010-2011 15 66803/10992 68.5 (58.5-78.4)
 2012-2013 9 10607/22511 54.5 (35.0-74.1)
 2014-2015 12 16919/31424 65.2 (49.3-81.1)
 2016-2018 7 24033/39501 68.6 (59.0-78.1)
Sample size (35)
 ≤5000 29 31832/55737 64.8 (53.5-76.1)
 >5000 6 52618/92714 57.7 (39.3-76.0)

N: Sample Size; n: Number of Children with Antibiotics; random-effect meta-analysis was used to calculate the overall pooled prevalence of antibiotic utilization. For studies reported different economic zone, study setting, hospital level, study period, sample size, we conducted meta- analysis more than once. Two studies study period was in 2009, therefore, there were 33 studies included subgroup analysis of study period.