Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 1;21:255. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-02706-z

Table 2.

The prevalence of inpatient antibiotic utilization by antibiotic combination situation, economic zone, study setting, and hospital level.

No. of studies (N) n/N Percentage (95% CI) (%)
Antibiotic combination situation (31)
 Single use of antibiotic 31 14591/24236 59.8 (51.0-68.6)
 Combined use of antibiotic 31 9654/24236 40.2 (31.4-49.0)
Economic zone (41)
 Eastern 25 29815/36466 81.0 (77.3-84.7)
 Central 9 17707/22043 78.9 (71.9-86.0)
 Western 13 23205/32583 80.5 (71.2-89.8)
Study setting (41)
 Urban 40 4420/58190 81.7 (77.5-86.0)
 Rural 2 219/296 76.3 (62.3-90.3)
Hospital level (41)
 Level 3 31 41159/54494 79.7 (74.7-84.6)
 Level 2 11 3437/3947 85.5 (81.6-89.5)
 Level 1 1 43/45 95.6(-)
Study period (35)
 2010-2011 22 30276/40486 82.9 (77.4-88.3)
 2012-2013 11 10748/12445 87.9 (84.3-91.4)
 2014-2015 8 9232/11193 82.9 (75.8-89.9)
 2016-2017 6 5801/ 8209 67.6 (57.1-78.1)
 2018-2019 4 3506/4351 82.3 (72.9-91.7)
Sample size (41)
 ≤1000 27 12534/15777 81.0 (76.8-85.3)
 >1000 15 32105/42709 82.0 (73.9-90.2)

N: Sample Size; n: Number of Children with Antibiotics; random-effect meta-analysis was used to calculate the overall pooled prevalence of antibiotic utilization. For studies reported different economic zone, study setting, hospital level, study period, sample size, we conducted meta- analysis more than once. Six studies study period was before 2010, therefore, there were 35 studies included subgroup analysis of study period.