Table 3. Example of Session 2 results from NBW Bhutan.
Technical area (cards) | Rabies | Anthrax | H5N1 | Brucellosis | Salmonellosis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Coordination at high Level | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
Coordination at local Level | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Coordination at technical Level | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Legislation / Regulation | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Finance | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Emergency funding | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Communication w/ media | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Communication w/ stakeholders | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
Field investigation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
Response | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Risk assessment | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Joint surveillance | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Laboratory | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
Education and training | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Human resources | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
Logistics | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 |
The collaboration for each of the 15 areas was assessed on a 1–3 Likert scale (1/green meaning ‘very satisfactory collaboration’; 2/yellow meaning ‘some level of collaboration but improvements are needed’ and 3/red meaning ‘the level of collaboration is really unsatisfactory’).