Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 23;5(7):bvab051. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvab051

Table 3.

Sensitivity analysis

Excluded study Pooled SMD [95% CI] Cochran Q P
Aktulay 2015 [46] 0.54 (0.29-0.79) 85.65 < .05
Basu 2018 [47] 0.47 (0.28-0.66) 43.96 < .05
Dincgez Cakmak 2019 [50] 0.59 (0.33-0.86) 92.35 < .05
Fashami 2020 [37] 0.63 (0.37-0.90) 85.65 < .05
Liu 2020 [35] 0.60 (0.33-0.86) 92.41 < .05
Sahbaz 2016 [51] 0.61 (0.34-0.87) 92.19 < .05
Sargin 2016 [36] 0.64 (0.39-0.89) 73.48 < .05
Sun 2020 [48] 0.61 (0.33-0.89) 91.65 < .05
Wang 2020 [34] 0.58 (0.31-0.85) 88.98 < .05
Yang 2015 [49] 0.62 (0.33-0.90) 89.39 < .05
Yilmaz 2014 [33] 0.53 (0.28-0.77) 79.84 < .05

No individual study significantly affected the pooled estimate.

Abbreviation: SMD, standardized mean difference.