Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 2;18(3):157–163. doi: 10.1016/j.reumae.2020.10.002

Table 2.

Care and clinical characteristics.

Variable Value
Type of consultation, n (%) Results of 1st visit = 49 (11)
Successive consultations  = 418 (89)
Type of review, na Clinical assessment = 354
Delivery of results  = 338
Adjustment to treatment = 38
Years of follow-up in rheumatology, mean (SD) 8.03 (2.5)
Number of visits per year, mean (SD) 2 (3.5)
Time (months ) from last review, media (SD) 6.19 (3.5)
Rheumatic disease attended, nb OA/STR = 199
OP = 141
RA = 99
PsA = 37
AS = 56
FM = 37
Gout = 20
SLE = 17
Col = 27
RPM = 15
ACPD = 5
Biologic therapy control, n (%) 98 (21)
No changes in treatment in RTC, n (%) 379 (81)
Duration of the RTC (minutes), mean (range) 9.64 (3−30)
Satisfaction with RTC NVS patient: mean (SD) 8.62 (4)
Satisfaction with RTC NVS doctor: mean (SD) 8.84 (.5)
Would they repeat RTC? Patient, yes, n (%) 391 (84)
Would they repeat RTC? Doctor, yes, n (%) 431 (92)

ACPD: Arthropathy from calcium pyrophosphate deposit; AS: Ankylosing Spondylitis, Col: Other colagenosis not SLE; FM: Fibromyalgia; OA/STR: Osteoarthritis/Soft tissue rheumatism; OP: Osteoporosis; PMR: Rheumatic Polymyalgia; PsA: Psoriatic Arthritis; RA: Rheumatoid Arthritis; RTC: Rheumatology Teleconference; SLE: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

a

No exclusive concepts.

b

Several rheumatological processes may concur in the same patient.