Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 1;44(3):817–828. doi: 10.1007/s10653-021-00978-z

Table 4.

Contents of heavy metals in four kind Chinese herbal medicines and the excessive situation of harmful elements

Elements Element content in four kinds Chinese herbal medicines (mg kg−1) Limiting
Value 1
Limiting
Value 2
Mean excess #
AL SB RA SG AL SB RA SG
Cr 4.58 ± 4.55 0.76 ± 0.23 0.05 ± 0.04 0.28 ± 0.10
Ni 4.12 ± 2.11 4.53 ± 1.21 5.27 ± 0.76 2.98 ± 0.48
Cu 24.73 ± 9.619 10.27 ± 2.02 82.93 ± 17.07 13.56 ± 6.22 20 20 23.64% / 250.80% /
Zn 58.11 ± 28.26 14.92 ± 2.56 50.49 ± 8.79 13.21 ± 3.85
As 0.19 ± 0.71 0.10 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.01 2 2 / / / /
Cd 0.45 ± 0.10 0.06 ± 0.01 0.24 ± 0.03 0.26 ± 0.15 1 0.3 48.67% / / /
Hg 0.20 ± 0.08 0.36 ± 0.13 0.20 ± 0.08 0.22 ± 0.12 0.2 0.2 / 81.99% / 8.00%
Pb 1.74 ± 0.67 0.79 ± 0.26 7.01 ± 1.63 0.86 ± 0.63 5 5 / / 40.29% /

Annotation: "" indicates that there is no relevant data provision in the soil quality standard; "/" indicates that there is no excess; Limiting value 1 reference (Commission, 2020), Limiting value 2 reference (MFTEC 2005); # the calculation formula is: (mean value of measured values of element content-pharmacopoeia limit)/ pharmacopoeia limit × 100%. Values were highlight with bold, which means higher than the standards instead of representing a statistical difference