Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 1;9(4):283–297. doi: 10.1007/s40336-021-00435-y

Table 3.

Summary table on [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging in systemic inflammations

Disease Clinical indication Patient preparation Imaging protocol Interpretation criteria Pitfalls Final report
Retroperitoneal Fibrosis

Diagnosis;

Evaluation of disease during/after treatment in patients with normal inflammatory markers and stable residual mass;

Evaluation of correct time to proceed to ureteral stent removal;

Discrimination between active and residual fibrotic tissue

According to

 EANM/SNMMI procedural guidelines

Whole body acquisitions (60’ after i.v. injection of 2.5–3 MBq/Kg of [18F]FDG)

Qualitative analysis

 (1) Location

  Anatomical description of pathologic tissue and its relationships with vascular and ureteral structures

 (2) Pattern

  diffuse, segmental, focal

 (3) Intensity of uptake

  Score 0: no uptake

 Score I: uptake < liver;

  Score II: uptake similar to liver;

  Score III: uptake > liver

Semi-quantitative analysis

 Limited value for SUVmax or T/B ratios

FP findings in

 Beam-hardening artifact;

 Diffuse aortic calcifications

FN findings under

 steroid or

 immunosuppressive therapy

Presence/absence of uptake;

Pattern of uptake;

Location;

Extent;

Intensity of uptake;

Possible DD;

Comparison with previous [18F]FDG PET/CT if performed;

Time between injection and image acquisition (in order to better compare SUVmax of basal and FU studies)

Fever of Unknown Origin / Inflammation of Unknown Origin

Evaluation of unknown inflammatory, infective or neoplastic sites;

Guide biopsy;

Evaluation of therapy efficacy

According to

 EANM/SNMMI procedural guidelines

Whole body acquisitions (60’ after i.v. injection of 2.5–3 MBq/Kg of [18F]FDG)

Qualitative analysis

 Based on the identification of all sites of pathological tracer uptake

[18F]FDG is not able to discriminate between infection and inflammation;

FN findings in patient under antibiotic treatment or steroid/immunosuppressive therapy

FP findings in

neoplastic tissues

Presence/absence of uptake;

Pattern of uptake;

Location;

Extent;

Intensity of uptake;

Possible DD;

Comparison with previous [18F]FDG PET/CT if performed;

Time between injection and image acquisition (in order to better compare SUVmax of basal and FU studies)

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Diagnosis in patients with suspected inflammatory bowel diseases in equivocal cases

Intestinal and extra-intestinal disease assessment;

Evaluation of complications;

Early evaluation of therapy efficacy

Follow-up and monitoring disease evolution

According to

 EANM/SNMMI procedural guidelines

Whole body acquisitions 60’ after i.v. injection of 2.5–3 MBq/Kg of [18F]FDG)

Qualitative analysis

 (1) Location

  Crohn’s Disease: any segment of GI tract;

  Ulcerative Colitis: mainly involves rectum with a possible extent to proximal parts

 (2) Pattern

  diffuse, segmental, focal

 (3) Intensity of uptake:

  Diffuse and mild glucose uptake in bowel: negative for inflammatory bowel diseases;

  Segmental and significant increased uptake in the intestinal tract: positive for inflammatory bowel diseases;

Semi-quantitative analysis

 Bowel SUVmax > than liver is suggestive for inflammatory bowel diseases

 However, no defined SUVmax cut-off has been identified

FP findings in:

 Diabetic patients assuming hypoglycemic oral therapy;

 Diverticulitis;

 Infectious colitis;

 Malignancies

FN findings in:

 Disease with a low grade activity;

 Recent administration of high dose of corticosteroid

Presence of increased glucose uptake in bowel segments and/or in extra-intestinal sites,

Pattern of uptake

Extent Intensity of uptake; Possible DD;

Comparison with previous [18F]FDG PET/CT if performed;

Time between injection and image acquisition (in order to better compare SUVmax of basal and FU studies)

Systemic sarcoidosis and tubercolosis

Evaluation of disease activity and extent;

DD between reversible granuloma from irreversible fibrosis;

Diagnosis of occult disease;

Evaluation of treatment response;

Guide biopsy

According to

 EANM/SNMMI procedural guidelines

Whole body acquisitions (from vertex to distal extremities of the lower limbs, 60’ after i.v. injection of 2.5–3 MBq/Kg of [18F]FDG)

Qualitative analysis

 Description of lymph nodes (lambda sign), pulmonary, pleural, lacrimal and a salivary glands, brain, musculoskeletal and brain involvement;

 For assessing myocardial involvement, see Table 1

Semi-quantitative analysis

 Limited value for SUVmax or T/B ratios

[18F]FDG is not able to achieve an accurate DD between infections, inflammation and

Malignancies (lymphomas)

Description of any site of increased glucose uptake,

Pattern of uptake distribution

Intensity of uptake;

Possible DD;

Comparison with previous [18F]FDG PET/CT if performed;

Time between injection and image acquisition (in order to better compare SUVmax of basal and FU studies)

EANM European Association of Nuclear Medicine, i.v. intra-venous, MBq Mega Bequerel, Kg Kilograms, [18F]FDG 18Fluorine fluorodeoxyglucose, p.i. post-injection, SUVmax standardized uptake value, T/B target/background, DD differential diagnosis, SS systemic sarcoidosis, SNMMI Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, CT computed tomography, PET/CT positron emission tomography/computed tomography, FP false positive, FN false negative, FU follow-up, GI gastro-intestinal