Skip to main content
. 2021 May 5;2021(5):CD013540. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013540.pub2

Whalley 2012.

Study characteristics
Methods Design: retrospective cohort
Setting: community
Country: UK
Duration of follow‐up: 6.25 years
Covariates controlled for: age and childhood IQ for linear regression; age, sex, family history of dementia, education, heart history, blood pressure history, ApoE e4 for logistic regression
Participants Participants numbers: 281
Population type: older adults
Sex: 42% women (119)
Age (mean): 77 years
Prognostic factors Anticholinergic burden measurement method: literature review of drugs' mean anticholinergic activity
Outcomes Outcomes assessed: dementia; cognitive decline
Outcome ascertainment dementia: consensus diagnosis based on multidisciplinary evaluation
Outcome ascertainment cognitive decline: MMSE and cognitive test battery of 5 cognitive tests
Diagnostic criteria dementia: ICD‐10 criteria
Diagnostic criteria cognitive decline: scores on cognitive testing
Source of funding Wellcome Trust
Notes  
 
Item Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Study participation Unclear Adequate reporting of age, sex, and comorbidities. However, limited age range included (77–82 years).
Study attrition No 281/324 participated. Only 136/281 (48%) participants had complete cognitive data sets available after follow‐up.
Prognostic factor measurement Unclear Relied on patient self‐report.
Outcome measurement Unclear No blinding but anticholinergic burden score likely applied in retrospect.
Study confounding Unclear No control for depression.
Reverse causation Unclear Excluded people with lower MMSE at baseline from analysis. Follow‐up 15 months minimum after baseline anticholinergic measurement taken.
Statistical analysis and reporting No Model was underpowered to assess dementia association (only 45 cases of dementia included in model yet 9 covariates).