Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2021 Mar 22;181:107424. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2021.107424

Table 1:

A re-examination of our main findings using the alternate measures of microstate activity: duration, coverage, and occurrence.

EFFECT DURATION COVERAGE OCCURRENCE
CHANGE IN MICROSTATE D FROM QR1 TO QR2 Microstate D significantly increased from 63.4ms to 72.8ms (t(38) = 4.08, p = .0002) Microstate D significantly increased from 13.1% to 19.3% (t(38) = 4.17, p = .0002) Microstate D significantly increased in appearance from 1.81 times per second to 2.44 times per second (t(38) = 4.01, p = .0003)
CHANGE IN MICROSTATE C FROM QR1 TO QR2 Microstate C significantly decreased from 86.6ms to 80.2ms (t(38) = −2.07, p = .045) Microstate C showed a trending decrease from 28.7% to 25.2% (t(38) = −1.95, p = .059) Microstate C decreased, but not significantly, in appearance from 2.97 times per second to 2.87 times per second (t(38) = −.76, p = .45)
QR2 MICROSTATE D CORRELATION WITH MEMORY FOR 1 PRES WORD-PAIRS Microstate D was not significantly related to recall for 1 PRES word pairs (r = .19, p = .19) Microstate D was significantly correlated with memory for 1 PRES words (r = .29, p = .04) Microstate D was significantly correlated with memory for 1 PRES words (r = .30, p = .04)
CORRELATION BETWEEN CHANGE IN MICROSTATE D FROM QR1 TO QR2 AND MEMORY FOR 1 PRESS WORD-PAIRS Change in microstate D did not significantly correlate with recall for 1 PRES word pairs (r = .16, p = .32) Change in microstate D was trending towards a significant positive correlation (r = .29, p = .08) Change in microstate D did not significantly correlate with recall for 1 PRES word pairs (r = .14, p = .40)