Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Dec 2;41(2):471–477. doi: 10.1177/0733464820975551

Table 2.

Comparison of CAPABLE program intervention effects from baseline to 5 months stratified by financial strain status as a binary variable

With financial strain (n = 215) Without financial strain (n = 48)
Outcomes Mean change (SE) Crude RR (95% CI) Adjusted RR (95% CI)§ Mean change (SE) Crude RR (95% CI) Adjusted RR (95% CI)§
ADL total score
 Control group (reference) −0.6 (0.3) 1.00 1.00 −2.0 (0.5) 1.00 1.00
 Intervention group −1.1 (0.2) 0.69 (0.49, 0.98) * 0.61 (0.43, 0.86) ** −1.0 (0.4) 0.82 (0.38, 1.74) 0.93 (0.41, 2.09)
IADL total score
 Control group −1.0 (0.3) 1.00 1.00 −1.7 (0.6) 1.00 1.00
 Intervention group −2.0 (0.3) 0.75 (0.56, 1.00) 0.69 (0.54, 0.87) ** −1.4 (0.4) 1.01 (0.53, 1.92) 0.89 (0.57, 1.40)

Notes:

*-

p < 0.05;

**-

p <0.01;

***-

p <0.001;

§ -

model adjusted for sex, race, unintentional weight loss, tiredness, and pain distress;

RR – relative risk; CI - confidence interval; SE - standard error; ADL - activities of daily living; IADL - instrumental activity of daily living.