Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Appl Gerontol. 2020 Dec 2;41(2):471–477. doi: 10.1177/0733464820975551

Table 3.

Comparison of CAPABLE program intervention effects from baseline to 5 months stratified by financial strain status as a three-category variable

	Some left over (n = 48)			Just enough (n = 123)			Not enough (n = 92)
Outcomes	Mean change (SE)	Crude RR (95% CI)	Adjusted RR (95% CI)^§	Mean change (SE)	Crude RR (95% CI)	Adjusted RR (95% CI)^§	Mean change (SE)	Crude IRR (95% CI)	Adjusted RR (95% CI)^§
ADL total score
Control group (reference)	−2.0 (0.5)	1.00	1.00	−0.5 (0.4)	1.00	1.00	−0.7 (0.3)	1.00	1.00
Intervention group	−1.0 (0.4)	0.82 (0.38,1.74)	0.93 (0.41,2.09)	−1.2 (0.2)	0.61 (0.39,0.95) ^*	0.58 (0.36,0.91) ^*	−1.1 (0.3)	0.79 (0.47,1.34)	0.61 (0.37,0.99) ^*
IADL total score
Control group (reference)	−1.7 (0.6)	1.00	1.00	−1.2 (0.4)	1.00	1.00	−0.7 (0.4)	1.00	1.00
Intervention group	−1.4 (0.4)	1.01 (0.53,1.92)	0.89 (0.57,1.40)	−1.7 (0.3)	0.84 (0.55,1.28)	0.78 (0.55,1.11)	−2.4 (0.4)	0.65 (0.44,0.97) ^*	0.53 (0.39,0.73) ^***

Notes:

^*-

p < 0.05;

^**-

p <0.01;

^***-

p <0.001;

^{§ -}

model adjusted for sex, race, unintentional weight loss, tiredness, and pain distress;

RR – relative risk; CI - confidence interval; SE - standard error; ADL - activities of daily living; IADL - instrumental activity of daily living.