Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 30;18(3):327–341. doi: 10.1007/s13770-021-00333-4

Table 2.

The main characteristics of various autogenous tooth materials

Graft Component Manufacture step Advantages Disadvantages Healing effect Implant
AutoBT HA, TCP ACP, OCP, Collagen, Non-collagenous proteins Dehydration, degreasing, demineralization, freeze-drying and sterilization

Osteoconduction

Osteoinduction

Physical and chemical properties are similar to those of human cortical bone

The immune response and infection are negligible

Relatively limited sources New bone formation occurred in most of the areas of interest [111] Stability is good, implant stability increases over time [117]
DDM HA, TCP ACP, OCP, Collagen, Non-collagenous proteins Dehydration, degreasing, demineralization, freeze-drying and sterilization

Osteoconduction

Osteoinduction

As the carrier of rh-BMP

The organic material was damaged

Osteoinduction is worse than that of AutoBT

As a scaffold for inducing bone formation [117] Low bone resorption rate after implant loading [114]
Tooth ash Mainly HA and β-TCP Cleaning, heating grinding to remove any impurities

Osteoconduction

Less cross-infection and immune responses

Absorbable

Easy to prepare, store and use

Without osteoinduction

Large mobility

Only has osteoconduction

Capacity [65]

Bone fusion at meager levels [65]