Skip to main content
. 2020 Aug 17;35(6):1629–1636. doi: 10.1038/s41433-020-01132-2

Table 2.

Risk of bias.

RoB 2.0 Schmoll [13] Brøndsted [30] Brøndsted [29] Zambrowski [31]
RCT RCT RCT RCT
Randomization process Some concerns Low risk Low risk Low risk
Deviation from intended interventionsa Some concerns Some concerns Some concerns Low risk
Missing outcome data High risk Low risk Low risk Low risk
Measurement of the outcome Some concerns Low risk Low risk Low risk
Selection of the reported result Some concerns Low risk Low risk Low risk
Overall High risk Some concerns Some concerns Low risk
ROBIN-I Alexander [14] Ayaki [32] Feng [15]
Cohort Cohort NRS
Confounding Moderate Moderate Moderate
Selection of participants into study Low Low Moderate
Classification of intervention Low Low Low
Deviations from intended intervention Moderate Moderate Moderate
Missing data Low Low Moderate
Measurement of outcomes Moderate Moderate Moderate
Selection of reported results Moderate Moderate Moderate

aEffect adhering to intervention.