Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 1;12:3271. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23061-8

Fig. 4. Nonclassical corrections probed by AGPs.

Fig. 4

a AGP’s wavevector as a function of the graphene–metal separation t, contrasting the metal’s response based on classical (d = 0) and quantum (d = ±4 Å) treatments. Inset: corresponding group velocity vp=ω/qq=q(ω0). b Dependence of the renormalized graphene–metal separation t~ts versus t. Setup parameters: rs = 3, ħγm = 0.1 eV, ϵd = 4, EF = 0.3 eV, and ħγ = 8 meV; we assume an excitation at λ0 = 11.28 μm (ħω0 ≈ 110 meV or f0 ≈ 26.6 THz)32. c Relative quantum shift of the AGP wavevector, ReΔq/Req0, with Δq ≡ q0 − q where q0 and q denote the AGP wavevector associated with d = 0 and d = −4 Å, respectively. The results presented in both a and c are based on the exact, numerical solution of Eq. (1).