Skip to main content
. 2021 May 19;8:647122. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.647122

Table 1.

Characteristics and quantitative synthesis of the eligible meta-analyses of DII for health outcomes.

Outcomes (reference) First author, year Study design included in meta-analysis No. of studies No. of cases/participants Level of comparison Summary effect size (95% CI)
Random effects Fixed effects
Cancer outcomes
Breast and prostate cancer (26) Moradi S, 2018 Cohort and Case–control study 9 9,972/52,203 Highest vs. lowest 1.70 (1.31–2.22) 1.40 (1.27–1.55)
Breast cancer (30) Liu, 2019 Cohort and Case–control study 12 30,052/347,147 Highest vs. lowest 1.34 (1.14–1.56) 1.19 (1.14–1.24)
Breast cancer (31) Jayedi A, 2018 Cohort and Case–control study 7 18,781/225,606 A 1-unit increment 1.04 (1.00–1.08) 1.01 (1.00–1.02)
Colon cancer (25) Zhang, 2017 Cohort and Case–control study 6 8,210/389,847 Highest vs. lowest 1.37 (1.16–1.62) 1.26 (1.18–1.36)
Colorectal cancer (37) Moazzen S, 2020 Cohort and Case–control study 11 28,645/1,037,658 Highest vs. lowest 0.66 (0.56–0.78) 0.79 (0.75–0.83)
Colorectal cancer (31) Jayedi A, 2018 Cohort and Case–control study 9 18,888/878,912 A 1-unit increment 1.06 (1.04–1.09) 1.04 (1.01–1.05)
Digestive tract cancer (24) Zahedi H, 2020 Cohort and Case–control study 14 15,399/694,894 Highest vs. lowest 1.83 (1.53–2.19) 1.29 (1.23–1.35)
Esophageal cancer (34) Li, 2018 Cohort and Case–control study 5 891/3,598 Highest vs. lowest 2.81 (2.07–3.82) 2.74 (2.11–3.57)
Gastric cancer (36) Liang, 2019 Cohort and Case–control study 3 700/2,118 Highest vs. lowest 2.12 (1.41–3.18) 1.95 (1.48–2.57)
Gastric cancer (36) Liang, 2019 Cohort and Case–control study 3 475/101,835 A 1-unit increment 1.45 (1.04–2.03) 1.24 (1.12–1.38)
Gynecological cancers (30) Liu, 2019 Cohort and Case–control study 18 33,907/357,095 Highest vs. lowest 1.38 (1.21–1.56) 1.21 (1.16–1.26)
Hormone-dependent cancer (24) Zahedi H, 2020 Cohort and Case–control study 14 22,234/239,666 Highest vs. lowest 1.22 (1.10–1.34) 1.10 (1.06–1.15)
Larynx cancer (35) Hua, 2020 Case–control study 3 997/2,805 Highest vs. lowest 2.05 (0.85–4.93) 2.67 (1.95–3.66)
Lung cancer (34) Li, 2018 Cohort and Case–control study 6 2,162/7,707 Highest vs. lowest 1.56 (1.21–2.01) 1.45 (1.22–1.73)
Oral cavity cancer (35) Hua, 2020 Case–control study 3 926/3,371 Highest vs. lowest 2.23 (1.73–2.86) 2.23 (1.73–2.86)
Overall cancer (34) Li, 2018 Cohort and Case–control study 44 48,032/1,298,343 Highest vs. lowest 1.58 (1.45–1.72) 1.37 (1.32–1.42)
Overall cancer (34) Li, 2018 Cohort and Case–control study 30 31,863/532,225 A 1-unit increment 1.13 (1.09–1.16) 1.08 (1.07–1.10)
Ovarian cancer (30) Liu, 2019 Cohort and Case–control study 4 3,104/7,982 Highest vs. lowest 1.41 (1.21–1.65) 1.41 (1.21–1.65)
Pharynx cancer (35) Hua, 2020 Case–control study 4 1,161/9,163 Highest vs. lowest 2.02 (1.54–2.64) 2.00 (1.59–2.51)
Prostate cancer (32) Zhu, 2019 Cohort and Case–control study 10 5,326/52,873 Highest vs. lowest 1.73 (1.34–2.23) 1.28 (1.17–1.39)
Prostate cancer (32) Zhu, 2019 Cohort and Case–control study 10 5,326/52,873 A 1-unit increment 1.10 (1.04–1.17) 1.04 (1.02–1.07)
Rectal cancer (25) Zhang, 2017 Cohort and Case–control study 7 4,679/730,773 Highest vs. lowest 1.44 (1.23–1.69) 1.42 (1.29–1.57)
Respiratory tract cancer (24) Zahedi H, 2020 Cohort and Case–control study 4 1,261/41,979 Highest vs. lowest 1.80 (1.21–2.67) 1.74 (1.40–2.16)
UADT cancer (35) Hua, 2020 Case–control study 9 4,394/19,984 Highest vs. lowest 2.27 (1.89–2.73) 1.93 (1.78–2.10)
Mortality
All-cause mortality (29) Namazi N, 2018 Cohort and Cross-sectional study 6 32,677/107,306 Highest vs. lowest 1.21 (1.09–1.35) 1.13 (1.09–1.18)
Cancer mortality (24) Zahedi H, 2020 Cohort and Case–control study 11 9,506/229,115 Highest vs. lowest 1.23 (1.07–1.42) 1.14 (1.07–1.22)
CVD mortality (27) Ji, 2020 Cohort study 10 32,319/385,765 Highest vs. lowest 1.31 (1.19–1.44) 1.21 (1.16–1.27)
CVD mortality (9) Shivappa N, 2017 Cohort and Cross-sectional study 6 11,094/93,866 A 1-unit increment 1.09 (1.03–1.15) 1.06 (1.04–1.08)
Metabolic outcomes
Central obesity (38) Farhangi MA, 2020 Cross-sectional study 10 6,904/25,435 Highest vs. lowest 1.16 (0.95–1.43) 1.06 (0.96–1.17)
Hypertension (33) Farhangi MA, 2019 Cross-sectional study 12 20,126/44,102 Highest vs. lowest 1.13 (1.01–1.27) 1.15 (1.08–1.23)
Hyperglycemia (33) Farhangi MA, 2019 Cross-sectional study 9 5,365/10,715 Highest vs. lowest 1.13 (0.95–1.35) 1.05 (0.95–1.16)
Metabolic syndrome (29) Namazi N, 2018 Cohort and Cross-sectional study 5 2,242/15,161 Highest vs. lowest 1.01 (0.82–1.24) 1.01 (0.87–1.18)
Other outcomes
CVD (27) Ji, 2020 Cohort study 6 1,310/43,385 Highest vs. lowest 1.41 (1.12–1.78) 1.35 (1.13–1.61)
CVD (9) Shivappa N, 2017 Cohort and Cross-sectional study 4 2,420/49,446 A 1-unit increment 1.08 (1.00–1.16) 1.03 (1.01–1.05)
Depression (28) Wang, 2018 Cohort and Cross-sectional study 6 4,864/49,584 Highest vs. lowest 1.23 (1.12–1.35) 1.23 (1.12–1.35)

CVD, cardiovascular disease; DII, dietary inflammatory index; UADT, upper aerodigestive tract.