Table 4.
Groups | n | CTC + US | p Value# | CTC + MMG | p Value# | US + MMG | p Value# | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive* | Negative | Positive* | Negative | Positive* | Negative | |||||
BC Patients | 238 | 215 | 23 | <0.0001 | 207 | 31 | <0.0001 | 207 | 31 | <0.0001 |
Patients with BBD | 217 | 58 | 159 | 35 | 182 | 50 | 167 | |||
Healthy volunteers | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | |||
(All BC patients number = 238) | ||||||||||
AJCC Stage | 0.0137 | 0.0951 | 0.03 | |||||||
0 | 17 | 12 | 5 | 12 | 5 | 11 | 6 | |||
I | 82 | 71 | 11 | 68 | 14 | 69 | 13 | |||
II | 106 | 100 | 6 | 96 | 10 | 96 | 10 | |||
III | 31 | 30 | 1 | 29 | 2 | 29 | 2 | |||
IV | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |||
TNM Stage | ||||||||||
Tumor Size | 0.0662 | 0.119 | 0.0695 | |||||||
Tis | 17 | 12 | 5 | 12 | 5 | 11 | 6 | |||
T1 | 117 | 106 | 11 | 99 | 18 | 102 | 15 | |||
T2 | 91 | 85 | 6 | 84 | 7 | 82 | 9 | |||
T3 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1 | 10 | 1 | |||
T4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |||
Lymph Node Involvement | 0.0115 | 0.0596 | 0.1872 | |||||||
N0 | 142 | 121 | 21 | 118 | 24 | 118 | 24 | |||
N1 | 72 | 71 | 1 | 68 | 4 | 67 | 5 | |||
N2 | 15 | 14 | 1 | 12 | 3 | 14 | 1 | |||
N3 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 8 | 1 | |||
Lymph Node Metastasis | 0.0011 | 0.0307 | 0.0307 | |||||||
Yes | 96 | 94 | 2 | 89 | 7 | 89 | 7 | |||
No | 142 | 121 | 21 | 118 | 24 | 118 | 24 |
BC, breast cancer; CTC, circulating tumor cell; US, ultrasound; MMG, mammogram; n, number of patients; BBD, benign breast diseases; AJCC, American Joint Committee on Cancer; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis; Tis, tumor in situ.
*Based on the Youden index analysis, CTC, US and MMG cut-off values were 2, 4b, and 4b, respectively. As long as any measurement of composing parameter was higher than its cut-off value, the combination result would be considered as positive for diagnosis.
#The p value of comparisons is based on the positive proportion among groups.
Bold values mean statistical significances.