Table 5.

Comparison of the advantages of the new method and manual verification

Advantages	Difference	Manual validation	New method	Explanation
Efficiency improvement	Whether to add extra workload?	YES	NO	No additional personnel are required to manually record the reason for the inconsistency. The new method is that the system completes judgment and records while personnel review the reports normally. The system will control the operation of the autoverification program based on the consistency results
	Can the cause of inconsistency be quickly determined?	NO	YES	The main reasons for the inconsistency are abnormal rule settings and lack of necessary rules. The new method correspondingly sets up correctness verification and integrity validation for these two main reasons. In different verification stages, only the main reason for that stage can be traced back
Risk control	Is it possible to skip the validation process?	YES	NO	Starting from setting the rules, the system will pull the validation process, and no validation link can be skipped
	Whether to ensure sufficient amount of validation data?	NO	YES	In the process of normal personnel issuance, the system will truthfully record the validation data. Before the set data volume is reached, the automated reporting function is prohibited
	Can autoverification be used in the case of failed validation?	YES	NO	When the system confirms that the validation fails due to a defect in the autoverification, it will prohibit the rule conversion or the automated reporting from being enabled