Skip to main content
. 2021 Winter;20(1):267–273. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2020.113868.14536

Table 2.

Comparison of SALT score, photographic scores and visual analog scale findings among three groups within the time

Treatment group Prior to treatment Within 3 months Within 6 months Within 9 months P -value
(within groups)
Disease SALT score a
Beamethasone 100% (100-100) 79.50% (68.83-89.25) 63% (40.75-75.16) 74% (64.16-88.41) <0.001
Methotrexate 100% (100-100) 90.83% (81.16-100) 78% (68.33-100) 77.66% (72-100) <0.001
Betamethasone+Methotrexate 100% (100-100) 79.50% (63.83-89) 61.83% (24.41-61.83) 57% (37.33-77.66) <0.001
P-value (between groups) - 0.044 0.059 0.078
Photographic scores b
Beamethasone 0 (0-0) 1 (0.5-1) 1 (1-2) 1 (0.5-1.25) <0.001
Methotrexate 0 (0-0) 0.5 (0-1) 1 (0-1) 1 (0-1) <0.001
Betamethasone+Methotrexate 0 (0-0) 1 (0.5-1) 2 (1-2.5) 2 (1-2) <0.001
P-value (between groups) - 0.11 0.073 0.12
Visual analog scale (0-10)
Beamethasone 0 (0-0) 3 (3-4) 5 (4.25-7) 3 (1.25-4) <0.001
Methotrexate 0 (0-0) 2.5 (0-3) 4 (0-5) 4 (0-5) <0.001
Betamethasone+Methotrexate 0 (0-0) 3.75 (0.75-5) 6 (3.25-8) 6 (4.25-7) <0.001
P-value (between groups) - 0.15 0.14 0.007

aDecrease in SALT score reflects improvement in the disease.

bIncrease in photographic score reflects improvement in the disease.