Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 2.
Published in final edited form as: Radiographics. 2021 Feb 5;41(2):321–337. doi: 10.1148/rg.2021200101

Table 1:

Screening Outcomes with Combined DBT and DM Compared with DM Alone in Representative Retrospective Studies Published in 2013–2016

Study and Year No. of Examinations Cancer Detection Rate Recall Rate
DBT/DM DM DBT/DM* DM* PValue DBT/DM DM PValue
Rose, 2013 (9) 9499 13 856 5.4 4.0 .07 5.5 8.7 <.001
Haas, 2013(10) 6100 7058 5.7 5.2 .7 8.4 12 <.01
Greenberg, 2014(11) 23 149 54 684 6.3 4.9 .0056 13.6 16.2 <.0001
McCarthy, 2014(12) 15 571 10 728 5.5 4.6 .02 8.8 10.4 <.001
Friedewald, 2014 (13) 173 663 281 187 5.4 4.2 <.001 9.1 10.7 <.001
Durand, 2015 (14) 8591 9364 5.9 5.7 .88 7.8 12.3 <.0001
Lourenco, 2015 (15) 12 921 12 577 5.4 4.6 .44 6.4 9.3 <.0001
McDonald, 2015 (16) 15 571 10 728 5.4 4.6 .41 8.8 10.4 <.001
Sharpe, 2016 (17) 5703 80 149 5.4 3.4 .0001 6.1 7.5 <.018
Conant, 2016 (18) 559 998 142 883 5.9 4.4 .0026 8.7 10.4 <.0001
All 830 766 623 214

Note.—Numbers in parentheses are reference numbers. Study populations may overlap in studies from the same institution.

*

Number per 1000 examinations.

Numbers are percentages.