Table 5.
Feedstock | Decision variable | Uncertainty | Objective function | Optimization approach | Year-region | Refs. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Corn |
Allocation decisions Capacity of facility Location of facility |
– | Minimize total cost | MILP | 2011-Brazil | [95] |
Microalgae |
Allocation decisions Capacity of facilities Technology selection |
– | Minimize total cost | MILP | 2015-South Korea | [96] |
Sawmill waste Agricultural residues Forest residues |
Allocation decisions Selection of technology Facility location Technology selection Allocation decisions Amount of production |
– | Maximize net present value | MILP | 2016-Germany | [97] |
Soybean Sunflower Jatropha |
Capacity of facilities Location of facilities Allocation decisions Technology selection Amount of production Transportation mode |
– | Maximize net present value | MILP | 2012-Argentina | [92] |
Soybean |
Selection of technology Facility location Allocation decisions Capacity of facility Inventory holding |
Biodiesel demand Biomass availability |
Total profit maximization | MILP | 2016- | [102] |
Microalgae |
Location of facilities Capacity of facilities Allocation decisions |
Resources supply Biodiesel demand Technical factors Cost parameters |
Minimize total costs | MILP | 2016-Iran | [100] |
Jatropha, used cooking oil |
Transportation mode Production capacity Facility location Capacity of facilities Inventory holding Allocation decisions |
Environmental and cost parameters |
Minimize environmental impact Minimize total costs |
MINLP MODM |
2017-Iran | [93] |