Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 1:1–8. doi: 10.1080/14737159.2021.1933449

Table 2.

Meta-analysis of the parameters of accuracy in different commercial molecular in vitro diagnostic tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 stratified by brand name

Brand name Sample No. of studies Pooled sensitivity (95% CI) Pooled specificity (95% CI)
Xpert Xpress SARS-CoV-2 test (Cepheid) Nasopharyngeal and nasal swab 2 0.956 (0.849–0.988)
I2 = 63.75%
0.964 (0.779–0.995)
I2 = 54.54%
Simplexa COVID-19 Direct (DiaSorin Molecular LLC) Nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and nasal swab 6 0.920 (0.862–0.955)
I2 = 42.13%
0.970 (0.937–0.986)
I2 = 18.32%
Cobas SARS-CoV-2 (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.) Nasopharyngeal, throat, sputum, saliva, stool, aspiration, and serum 2 0.963 (0.836–0.993)
I2 = 0%
0.998 (0.991–1.000)
I2 = 0%
ID NOW COVID-19 (Abbott Diagnostics Scarborough, Inc.) Nasopharyngeal and nasal swab 4 0.916 (0.805–0.966)
I2 = 65.42%
0.942 (0.708–0.991)
I2 = 79.63%
Allplex 2019-nCoV Assay (Seegene Inc.) Nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and nasal swab 2 0.978 (0.916–0.995)
I2 = 0%
0.982 (0.884–0.998)
I2 = 0%
Panther Fusion SARS-CoV-2 (Hologic, Inc.) Nasopharyngeal swabs, deep throat saliva, and lower respiratory tract 2 0.994 (0.956–0.999)
I2 = 0%
0.982 (0.931–0.995)
I2 = 0%
BioFire COVID-19 Test (BioFire Defense, LLC) Nasopharyngeal, oropharyngeal, and nasal swab 2 0.967 (0.743–0.997)
I2 = 64.77%
0.982 (0.931–0.995)
I2 = 0%