Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 26;12(21):7561–7568. doi: 10.1039/d1sc01029h

Optimisation of the reaction conditionsa.

Entry T (°C) C (M) B (mol%) Time (h) Conv.b (%) 5 c (%) eed (%)
1 RT 0.5 10 16 100 20 64/66
2 RT 0.1 10 39 87 7 76/77
3 RT 0.1 7.5 48 94 10 76/76
4 RT 0.1 5 48 76 5 79/76
5 40 0.1 5 48 100 25 76/73
6 0 0.1 10 48 81 0 79/81
7 0 0.2 10 48 97 2 76/76
8 −20 0.2 10 72 86 0 79/78
a

Unless otherwise noted, all reactions were carried out with 0.1 mmol of 1a, 0.2 mmol of 2, and 0.05 mmol of (MeO)3C6H3 in toluene; d.r. was determined from the reaction mixture by 1H NMR spectroscopy and varied between 81 : 19 to 87 : 13; for full details see the ESI.

b

Conversion depicts the amount of reacted 1a based on 1H qNMR measurements using (MeO)3C6H3 as an internal standard. Generally, the total amount of the formed 3a and retro-Michael product 5 corresponded to the amount of 1a depleted.

c

Describes the extent of product decomposition through the retro-Michael reaction determined by 1H qNMR, using the methylene proton signal of triethyl phosphonoacetate 5.

d

Determined by HPLC analysis on a chiral stationary phase.