Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 2;16(6):e0252329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252329

Table 4. Bivariate correlations as validity evidence based on the relation of the instrument to other variables (test—criteria correlation).

Measures 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1. CEER+ -
2. CEER- -.18* -
3. RAS .37* -.37* -
4. Consensus (DAS) .41* -.30* .70* -
5. Satisfac. (DAS) .41* -.41* .80* .66* -
6. Cohesion (DAS) .41* -.25* .51* .55* .54* -
7. A. expres. (DAS) .34* -.33* .60* .55* .56* .54* -
8. Global DAS .47* -.38* .78* .89* .87* .75* .70* -
Descriptive statistics
Possible range [1, 5] [1, 5] [1, 5] [0, 65] [0, 50] [0, 24] [0, 12] [0, 151]
M 4.48 1.83 4.20 51.23 40.63 17.76 11.07 120.69
SD 0.50 0.75 0.73 8.34 7.21 3.94 2.48 18.67

N = 528. Spearman correlations are shown. CEER+ = Positive Couples Extrinsic Emotion Regulation; CEER- = Negative Couples Extrinsic Emotion Regulation; RAS = Relationship Assessment Scale; DAS = Dyadic Adjustment Scale; Satisfac. = Satisfaction; A. expres. = Affectional expression. *p < .01.