Skip to main content
. 2020 Oct 22;31(2):393–404. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09929-4

Table 1.

Topic list interviews

Topic Sub topics
Use of the MiLES intervention

Use of the intervention in general

Reasons (not) to use intervention

When and where the intervention has been used

Barriers to and facilitators for using the intervention (e.g. personal factors, organizational factors or technical issues)

Usefulness of the MiLES intervention

Usefulness of the intervention in general

Rationale behind the perceived usefulness

Usefulness of parts of the intervention:

 Animation homepage

 Tips per RTW phase

 Communication videos

 External blogs and videos concerning the cancer survivor’s perspective

 External websites concerning privacy, external expertise, and laws and regulations

 Conversation checklists

Suggestions for improving the usefulness of the intervention

Usefulness in respect of willingness to support

Usefulness in respect of the employer’s willingness to support in general

Usefulness in respect of the following “willingness-related” topics:

 Perception of the cancer survivor

 Perception of most important employer actions

Suggestions for improving the usefulness of the intervention in respect of increasing the employer’s willingness to support

Usefulness in respect of ability to support

Usefulness in respect of the employer’s ability to support in general

Usefulness in respect of the following “ability-related” topics:

Knowledge to support cancer survivors

 Skills regarding supporting cancer survivors

 Ability to deal with external factors

Suggestions for improving the usefulness of the intervention in respect of increasing the employer’s ability to support

All questions were individualized based on the quantitative answers of the participant. For each question, several alternative questions were asked, in order to get in-depth insights into the topics and sub topics concerned