Skip to main content
. 2021 May 4;19(1):893–906. doi: 10.1007/s40201-021-00657-2

Table 3.

Summary of ANOVA results for RSM CCD

Response Model Anova
Source sum of square df F-value P-value
In recovery(%) Quadratic model 11,289.96 14 9.82 <0.0001
A: FeSO4.7H2O 1395.37 1 16.99 0.0012
B: S0 22.04 1 0.27 0.6131
C: solid content 18.38 1 0.22 0.6441
D: Initial pH 2882.04 1 35.09 <0.0001
AB 430.56 1 5.24 0.0394
AC 10.56 1 0.13 0.7256
AD 60.06 1 0.73 0.4080
BC 390.06 1 4.75 0.0483
BD 22.56 1 0.27 0.6090
CD 52.56 1 0.64 0.4381
A2 4866.36 1 59.25 <0.0001
B2 18.82 1 0.23 0.6402
C2 18.82 1 0.23 0.6402
D2 690.69 1 8.41 0.0124
Residual 1067.75 13 82.13
Lack of fit 1067.75 10 106.87
Pure error 0.000 3 0.000
Cor total 12,357.71 27
Sr recovery(%) Quadratic model 35.72 14 12.25 0.0001
A: FeSO4.7H2O 0.016 1 0.074 0.7893
B: S0 3.58 1 18.49 0.0.0007
C: solid content 20.41 1 105.36 0.0001
D: Initial pH 0.33 1 1.72 0.2104
AC 0.62 1 3.20 0.0952
AD 0.34 1 1.75 0.2069
BC 0.095 1 0.49 0.4962
BD 0.026 1 0.14 0.7175
CD 1.15 1 5.94 0.0288
A2 3.44 1 17.75 0.0009
B2 2.17 1 11.22 0.0048
C2 1.31 1 6.79 0.0208
D2 0.31 1 1.61 02249
Residual 2.71 14 0.323
Lack of fit 2.56 11 4.59 0.1181
Pure error 0.15 3
Cor total 38.43 27