Table 3.
Association between unfavourable changes in neighbourhood characteristics and lifestyle factors in a subgroup of participants who did not move residential address during the study period and who had a healthy lifestyle and lived in an advantaged residential neighbourhood at baseline
|
Smoking relapse in individuals who were ex–smokers at baseline |
Heavy drinking in individuals who were moderate or non-drinkers at baseline |
Physical inactivity in individuals who were physically active at baseline |
≥5% bodyweight gain among individuals who did not have obesity at baseline |
Change from having 0 or 1 lifestyle risk factor to having ≥2 lifestyle risk factors |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n/N (%) | OR (95% CI)* | n/N (%) | OR (95% CI)* | n/N (%) | OR (95% CI)* | n/N (%) | OR (95% CI)* | n/N (%) | OR (95% CI)* | |
| Neighbourhood education | ||||||||||
| Stable advantaged | 430/7559 (5·7%) | 1 (ref) | 2533/34 032 (7·4%) | 1 (ref) | 4592/34 722 (13·2%) | 1 (ref) | 8246/36 728 (22·5%) | 1 (ref) | 2508/37 446 (6·7%) | 1 (ref) |
| From advantaged to disadvantaged | 96/1515 (6·3%) | 1·06 (0.84–1·34) | 497/6389 (7·8%) | 1·01 (0·91–1·11) | 947/6323 (15·0%) | 1·11 (1·03–1·20) | 1618/6700 (24·2%) | 1·04 (0·98–1·11) | 586/6803 (8·6%) | 1·23 (1·12–1·35) |
| Neighbourhood income | ||||||||||
| Stable advantaged | 466/8512 (5·5%) | 1 (ref) | 2728/38 005 (7·2%) | 1 (ref) | 5115/37 796 (13·5%) | 1 (ref) | 9065/39 916 (22·7%) | 1 (ref) | 2861/41 102 (7·0%) | 1 (ref) |
| From advantaged to disadvantaged | 74/1060 (7·0%) | 1·26 (0·97–1·64) | 339/4439 (7·6%) | 1·02 (0·91–1·15) | 647/4374 (14·8%) | 1·06 (0·97–1·16) | 1138/4629 (24·6%) | 1·08 (1·00–1·16) | 382/4700 (8·1%) | 1·11 (0·99–1·24) |
| Neighbourhood unemployment | ||||||||||
| Stable advantaged | 362/6748 (5·4%) | 1 (ref) | 2251/30 029 (7·5%) | 1 (ref) | 4089/30 137 (13·6%) | 1 (ref) | 7356/31 821 (23·1%) | 1 (ref) | 2262/32 558 (7·0%) | 1 (ref) |
| From advantaged to disadvantaged | 172/2617 (6·6%) | 1·21 (1·00–1·47) | 813/10 991 (7·4%) | 0·97 (0·89–1·05) | 1567/10 783 (14·5%) | 1·05 (0·98–1·12) | 2723/11 460 (23·8%) | 0·94 (0·88–1·01) | 928/11 699 (7·9%) | 1·10 (1·02–1·19) |
| Neighbourhood green space | ||||||||||
| Stable advantaged | 549/9750 (5·6%) | 1 (ref) | 2946/41 768 (7·1%) | 1 (ref) | 5975/40 464 (14·8%) | 1 (ref) | 10 170/43 013 (23·6%) | 1 (ref) | 3319/44 111 (7·5%) | 1 (ref) |
| From advantaged to disadvantaged | 92/1226 (7·5%) | 1·28 (1·02–1·62) | 375/5317 (7·1%) | 0·97 (0·87–1·09) | 761/5214 (14·6%) | 1·00 (0·92–1·09) | 1266/5531 (22·9%) | 0·94 (0·88–1·01) | 470/5674 (8·3%) | 1·11 (1·00–1·23) |
OR=odds ratio.
*
Calculated using logistic regression analysis with generalised estimating equations, adjusted for age, sex, education, survey pair, and cohort.