Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 2;11:11583. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-90765-8

Table 3.

Hazard ratio of RVO in ESRD group and KT group.

Outcomes Groups Rate Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Per 1000 patient-years Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value Hazard ratio (95% CI) P-value
RVO, total ESRD 5.68 1 (Ref.) 1 (Ref.) 1 (Ref.)
KT 2.74 0.49 (0.40, 0.59) < 0.001 0.48 (0.40, 0.58) < 0.001 0.47 (0.29, 0.58) < 0.001
Non-ischemic RVO ESRD 4.60 1 (Ref.) 1 (Ref.) 1 (Ref.)
KT 2.26 0.50 (0.4, 0.61) < 0.001 0.49 (0.39, 0.60) < 0.001 0.48 (0.39, 0.60) < 0.001
Ischemic RVO ESRD 1.07 1 (Ref.) 1 (Ref.) 1 (Ref.)
KT 0.48 0.46 (0.30, 0.72) < 0.001 0.45 (0.29, 0.70) < 0.001 0.44 (0.28, 0.70) < 0.001

Analysis was performed using Cox regression. Model 1: not adjusted; Model 2: adjusted with age, sex; Model 3: adjusted with age, sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, Charlson comorbidity index, income status.

CI confidence interval, ESRD end stage renal disease, KT kidney transplantation, RVO renal vein occlusion.