Table 3.
Description des jeunes et de leur devenir dans les études évaluant le devenir à long terme après une hospitalisation soins-études.
| References | Péraud (46) and Péraud et al. (48)Pages (36) | Condé-Diaz (38) | Gibert (41) | Pépin (44) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facility or facilities concerned | Dupré and Heuyer | Sarrailh | Arnaud | Dupré | Daguet | |||
| Time lapse between hospitalisation and evaluation (years) | 2–13 | 1–15 | 3–7 | 1 | 0.75–2.42 | |||
| Numbers (total/respondents) | 743/913 | 327/1,100 | 140/147 | 43/49 | 42/63 | |||
| Response rates (%) | 81.4 | 33.3 | 95.2 | 89.8 | 66.7 | |||
| At admission | Mean age (years) | 22.25 | 17.1a | 22.4 | 19.5 | 18 | ||
| Male gender (%) | 61 | 81 (co-ed from 1981) | 67.8 | 44 | 39 | |||
| At re-contact | Mean age at evaluation | 30.42 | 24.4a | 28.8 | 20.5 | – | ||
| Male gender (%) | 63 | 81 | 67.8 | 44 | 39 | |||
| Average length of stay (months) | 7.72 | 14 | 17.07 | 11.5 | 11 | |||
| Evaluation at discharge | Improvement (%) | 63 | 43.8 | 52.1 | – | Person: 63.4 | Parents: 74.3 | GAFb: 73.2 |
| Stagnation (%) | } 37 | 40.7 | 37.8 | – | Person: 17.1 | Parents: 17.1 | GAFb: 26.8 | |
| Aggravation (%) | 23 | 9.2 | – | |||||
| Death from suicide in the course of care (%) | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0 | 0 | |||
| Contact strategy | Letter to subject, if no reply, to parents, then GPc. If no reply cheque of registries | Letter to subject | Letter to subject, if no reply, to parents then to psychiatrist, then phone contacts | Phone calls to subject and parents. Letter to treating psychiatrist | Phone calls to subjects and parents. Letter to treating psychiatrist | |||
| Type of evaluation | Interviews. If not possible interviews with parents or questionnaire to parents or GP | Questionnaires | Questionnaires | Semi-directive phone interviews with subject and parents. Questionnaire to psychiatrist | Semi-directive phone interviews with subject and parents. Questionnaire to psychiatrist | |||
| Evaluation at re-contact | Number of death for which researchers were informed: N (crude mortality rate, %) | 80 (8.8) | 71 among which 22 in the fire in the facility (21.7) | 12 (8.6) | 1 (2.3) | 1 (2.4) | ||
| Death from suicide: N (rate, %) | NA: “most” (of the deaths) | ≥24 (≥7.3) | 11 (7.9) | – | 1 (2.4) | |||
| Hospitalisation(s) in psychiatry after discharge (%) | 66.5 | 35 | 69.5 | 35 | 36.6 | |||
| Psychiatric follow-up on-going (%) | 52 | 33 | 82 | 62.8 | 63.4 | |||
| Psychotropic treatment on-going (%) | – | 27 | 78.9 | 65.1 | 51.2 | |||
| Present professional activity or training (%)d | 74.1 | 65 | 31.2 | 76.7 | 58.5 | |||
| Not working (%) | 21.2 | 35 | 44.2 | 23.2 | 41.5 | |||
| Disability status or disability allowance (%) | 11 | 14.5 | 57 | 7 | 14.6 | |||
| Clinical improvement (%) | Opinion of young people | – | 65 | – | – | 53.7 | ||
| Opinion of parents | – | – | – | } 63 | 65.7 | |||
| Opinion of psychiatrist | 72 (65% taking stabilisation into account | – | – | 73.7 | ||||
| On the GAFb | – | – | – | – | 53.7 | |||
a
Mean age calculated from the graphs in the study by Pages.
b
GAF, Global Assessment of Functioning.
c
GP, general practitioner.
d
Some had professional activity and training concurrently.
- = NA, not available, data not collected.
The data in italics was calculated from information in the studies.