Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 11;100(7):101118. doi: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101118

Table 4.

Apparent nutrient and energy utilization of broiler chicken mixtures %1.

Treatments2
Components Control CAM.IR FLA.IR SUN.IR SEM3 P-value4
21–35 d (grower)5
Dry matter 75.6 81.7 83.1 79.7 0.12 0.241
Crude protein6 74.3b 78.3a 77.2ab 76.4ab 0.24 0.035
Ether extract 74.1 71.4 69.6 70.5 0.13 0.168
Organic matter 81.6b 86.5b 87.3a 86.9a 0.11 0.021
Gross energy 87.6 85.3 86.9 83.3 0.09 0.253
36–42 d (finisher)5
Dry matter 82.3 85.4 86.1 84.9 0.21 0.231
Crude protein6 75.3 78.3 79.1 76.8 0.09 0.283
Ether extract 73.4 75.6 72.6 78.2 0.31 0.106
Organic matter 82.3b 88.5ab 89.8a 85.7b 0.14 0.017
Gross energy 86.3 87.1 90.5 89.6 0.08 0.135
1

Data represent the mean of 5 cages (10 broiler chickens/cage) per treatment.

2

Control – diet without oilseeds. CAM.IR – diet with 15% of infrared-irradiated camelina seeds. SUN.IR – diet with 15% of infrared-irradiated sunflower seeds. FLA.IR - with 15% of infrared-irradiated flax seeds.

3

SEM - standard error of the mean.

4

P < 0.05; a,bstatistical differences.

5

Throughout the rearing cycle, the preparation and analysis of nutrient utilization lasted 7 d and ended on the last d of rearing: 35 and 42d.

6

Calculated by Kjeldhal nitrogen N × 6.25.