Abstract
Regarding the relation of halitosis with oral infections and its effects on social relations between humans, the present study investigated the positive effects of probiotics on prevention or treatment of halitosis. The causative agents of halitosis are volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs), and halitosis is divided into oral and non-oral types according to the source of the VSCs. H2S and CH3SH are two main halitosis metabolites—produced following the degradation of proteins by bacteria in the mouth—however, CH3SCH3 has a non-oral origin, and is a blood neutral molecule. Just as much as halitosis is important in medicine, its psychological aspects are also considered, which can even lead to suicide. Today, the use of probiotics as a new therapeutic in many roles is in progress. Most probiotics are used for the treatment of gastrointestinal tract disorders, but various studies on the alleviation of halitosis by use of probiotics have reported satisfactory results. The genera Lactobacillus, Streptococcus and Weissella are among the most useful probiotics for the prevention or treatment of halitosis in the oral cavity.
Keywords: Dental caries, halitosis, periodontal diseases, probiotic, volatile sulphur compounds
Introduction
Halitosis or bad breath, can have a variety of causes, such as poor oral hygiene, dental caries, periodontal diseases (periodontitis and gingivitis), corruption of residual food between teeth and tongue debris [1]. The term halitosis consists of two parts: halitus (a Latin word) meaning breath, and osis (a Greek suffix) meaning abnormal or diseased [2]. Gaseous compounds such as volatile sulphur compounds (VSCs) are responsible for mouth malodour, and their sources are divided into oral and non-oral. VSCs are derived metabolites of the bacterial putrefaction process [3]. The majority of VSCs are produced following degradation of food and salivary proteins by oral bacteria, and the use of amino acids by VSC-producing bacteria. Most bacteria involved in periodontitis such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, Prevotella intermedia and Fusobacterium nucleatum, can produce VSCs. These compounds include hydrogen sulphide (H2S) and methyl mercaptan (CH3SH) [4,5]. Overall, halitosis classification consists of three categories—genuine halitosis, pseudo-halitosis and halitophobia (or psychological halitosis). Genuine halitosis is considered a pathological condition, as it is caused by oral bacterial infections and leads to periodontal diseases such as dental plaque (a bacterial biofilm), periodontitis and gingivitis. In such cases, treatment of the infections is urgent, and leads to amelioration and reduction in malodour. Pseudo-halitosis is associated with the absence of any pathological symptoms, but the person believes in the presence of malodour in the mouth. Halitophobia occurs after treatment of genuine halitosis or pseudo-halitosis in patients who still think about and fear halitosis. Patients with halitophobia maintain an illusion about other people's hate for them [6]. Among all halitosis states, halitophobia is probably the worst, because it can gradually be exchanged for a social anxiety disorder or a state of social phobia. Individuals with halitophobia must be under the supervision of a psychological specialist, as they may progress to suicide [7]. Scientifically, probiotics encompass the viable bacteria and yeasts that, when consumed in adequate amounts, have benefits for humans (or animals) [8]. According to WHO, the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations and the European Food Safety Authority, the acceptable conditions for probiotics include safety for humans, and persistence against acid and bile [9]. Eli Metchnikoff, the Russian scientist and Nobel laureate, was the first researcher to demonstrate the benefits of consumption of a yogurt probiotic on the gastrointestinal tract of Bulgarian peasants [10]. Today, studies have demonstrated the positive effects of probiotic products (especially fermented dairy products) in the treatment of many chronic gastrointestinal disorders such as diarrhoeal diseases, Helicobacter pylori infection, irritable bowel syndrome, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and inadequate lactase digestion, as well as in immunosuppressive states, paediatric allergies, growth retardation, hyperlipidaemia, halitosis and cancer prevention [[11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]]. Probiotic microorganisms contain both bacteria and yeasts. The most usable bacterial genera include Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, Pediococcus, Leuconostoc, Bacillus and Escherichia coli; the only yeast is Saccharomyces [19]. Through science-based studies, consumption of probiotic products (e.g. yogurt, milk, cheese, butter, or even gum) can significantly mitigate or treat oral and dental diseases, such as caries, gingivitis and periodontitis [[20], [21], [22], [23], [24]]. In the present study, we critically summarize the relationship between the causative microorganisms of halitosis and probiotics effects (Fig. 1).
Epidemiology of halitosis
Millions of people have halitosis worldwide; some studies on its prevalence report values between 22% and 50%, and others give 6% and 23% [25]. The American Dental Association, the largest dental association in the USA, reported that globally, approximately 50% of adults have had occasional halitosis, but 25% are affected by chronic halitosis. In general, oral hygiene is a very effective factor for the prevention of halitosis, because 80%–90% of halitosis is the result of long-term and untreated oral cavity disorders (caries and periodontal diseases), and is directly associated with poor oral hygiene [25]. Based on a meta-analysis reported by Silva et al. [26], it was demonstrated that the incidence of halitosis in low- to middle-income countries (39.8%) is higher than in high-income countries (29%), which indicates the close relationship between halitosis and economic conditions. Poor cultural and economic conditions can be considered as two major factors for creating periodontal diseases and, consequently, halitosis; in low-income countries, conditions such as unhealthy diet and poor nutrition, physical inactivity, tobacco use, as well as excessive use of alcohol are more visible [27].
Oral and non-oral halitosis
Oral halitosis
Based on the source of VSC production, halitosis is divided into extra-oral (or non-oral) halitosis and intra-oral (or oral) halitosis. The composition of the orally resident microbiota is over 700 species, and the physicochemical properties of saliva play a significant role in microbial equilibrium. One millilitre of saliva contains about 108 microorganisms. Poor oral hygiene and restoration defects lead to accumulation of food debris and dental bacterial plaque on the teeth and tongue; degradation of this retained debris by bacteria causes oral halitosis [28,29]. Therefore, 90% of halitosis is related to intra-oral halitosis, and only about 10% of cases are related to extra-oral [[30], [31], [32]]. However, no obvious association exists between halitosis and any specific bacterial infection, suggesting that bad breath reflects complex interactions between several oral bacterial species. It is generally believed that Gram-negative anaerobic bacteria digest proteins from food residues, desquamated cells from oral mucosa leucoocytes and other saliva debris into amino acids that accumulate in the oral cavity and originate oral halitosis [33].
These bacteria can be isolated from the subgingival plaque in individuals with gingivitis or periodontitis, and the saliva and the dorsum of the tongue in healthy individuals. Several microorganisms recovered from periodontal lesions of gingivitis and periodontitis can produce large amounts of VSCs. Odour outcomes are significantly correlated with total counts of bacteria and the diversity of each type. As desquamating epithelial cells and remnants are available, putrefaction occurs. During the process of bacterial putrefaction, however, compounds other than sulphur compounds are also formed. Peptides are hydrolysed to amino acids, which can be metabolized further to amines or polyamines. The researchers concluded that halitosis is a result of multifaceted interactions between diverse species of bacteria [34].
In this regard, cleavage of certain amino acids led to bacterial metabolism production, principally of VSCs (H2S, CH3SH and dimethyl sulphide [CH3]2S), organic acids (butyric acid), aromatic complexes (indole, skatole) and amines (putrescine, cadaverine). Studies in vitro and in vivo have demonstrated that oral surfaces are colonized by several bacterial species associated with oral malodour and responsible for the production of the malodorous compounds known as VSCs [35]. (Table 1).
Table 1.
VSCs | Source | Bacterial species |
---|---|---|
H2S | Serum |
Prevotella intermedia Prevotella loescheii Porphyromonas gingivalis |
Cysteine |
Peptostreptococcus anaerobius Micros prevotii Eubacterium limosum Bacteroides spp. Centipedia periodontii Selenomonas artemidis |
|
CH3SH | Serum |
Porphyromonas gingivalis Treponema denticola Porphyromonas endodontalis |
Methionine |
Fusobacterium nucleatum Fusobacterium periodonticum Eubacterium spp. Bacteroides spp. |
Oral halitosis is caused by resident bacteria in the mouth. VSCs such as H2S and methyl mercaptan, are oral halitosis metabolites produced by oral cavity bacteria, especially tongue-coating areas [36]. The majority of cases of halitosis are related to oral halitosis, which is caused by different oral bacteria species. In the oral cavity, tongue coating, in particular, its dorsal surface, is considered the main area for halitosis production. This area is the best residential location for the accumulation of various bacteria. The studies show that the dorsal tongue has a peculiar capacity for binding to various bacteria. In this region, each epithelial cell can bind more than 100 bacteria—for comparison, the binding capacity of other types of oral epithelium is about 25 bacteria per cell. In addition, the existence of fissures in the dorsal tongue surface provides a hypoxic environment for the growth of VSC-producing anaerobic bacteria [37]. Usually, the VSCs and other odoriferous compounds are derived from the interaction of bacteria with specific amino acids. In general, the interaction of anaerobic bacteria with cysteine, methionine, tryptophan, arginine and lysine, leads to biotransformation of these amino acids to H2S, CH3SH, indole, putrescine and cadaverine, respectively [38,39].
Non-oral halitosis
As noted above, 10% of halitosis cases are related to non-oral halitosis. Several extra-oral conditions have been proposed that account for extra-oral halitosis, and can be divided into halitosis from the ear, nose, and throat region, pulmonary pathology, gastrointestinal tract and blood-borne halitosis. In blood-borne halitosis, malodorous compounds in the bloodstream are carried to the lungs where they volatilize and enter the breath. Some systemic diseases are the basis of blood-borne halitosis, including liver pathology and endocrinological diseases, metabolic disorders, medications, and certain foods. Acute tonsillitis is the most significant reason for halitosis from the ear, nose, and throat region. Respiratory disorders such as bronchiectasis, lung abscesses or necrotizing lung neoplasia can produce an unpleasant odour. Several digestive diseases like gastro-oesophageal reflux or Helicobacter pylori infection may be associated with halitosis. Several well-recognized aetiologies for extra-oral malodour include renal failure, cirrhosis of the liver and diabetes [[40], [41], [42]]. The main microorganisms associated with oral halitosis and non-oral halitosis are listed in Table 2.
Table 2.
Potential microorganisms associated with halitosis (in alphabetical order) | Cause of non-oral halitosis |
---|---|
Atopobium parvulum | Respiratory system problems |
Campylobacter rectus |
|
Centipeda periodontii |
|
Eikenella corrodens | Sinusitis |
Enterobacteriaceae | Antral malignancy |
Eubacterium sulci | Foreign bodies in the nose or lung |
Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. nucleatum | Nasal malignancy and nasal sepsis |
Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. polymorphum | Subphrenic abscess |
Tonsilloliths and tonsillitis | |
Fusobacterium nucleatum subsp. vincentii | Pharyngeal malignancy |
Fusobacterium periodonticum | Lung infections, bronchitis and bronchiectasis Lung malignancy |
Micromonas micros | |
Porphyromonas endodontalis | Gastrointestinal disease |
Porphyromonas gingivalis | Hepatic disease |
Prevotella (Bacteroides) melaninogenica | Haematological disorders |
Prevotella intermedia | Endocrine system disorders |
Solobacterium moorei | Metabolic conditions |
Tannerella forsythia (Bacteroides forsythus) | Leukaemias and renal failure |
Treponema denticola |
Claimed beneficial probiotic bacteria
Probiotics as endogenous microflora
Some bacteria and viruses are toxic and lethal for humans, including Yersinia pestis, Bordetella pertussis, Clostridium tetani, Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Vibrio cholerae, as well as influenza virus and human immunodeficiency virus. However, scientific findings are scarce concerning the endogenous microflora that live with humans and are in a symbiotic state. Human microbiome describes a beneficial relationship between human and endogenous microorganisms [19,43].
Commensal probiotics in the oral cavity
Although many factors such as food debris, metabolic disorders and respiratory tract infections can contribute to the halitosis phenomenon, the main causative factor for halitosis is an imbalance (dysbiosis) in oral commensal flora composition [44]. Streptococcus salivarius is a non-pathogenic and predominant oral species that is one of the most important commensal probiotics, and most frequently isolated from people without halitosis. Streptococcus salivarius K12 can produce two lantibiotics—salivaricin A2 (SalA2) and salivaricin B (SboB). Clinical trials show that antimicrobial mouthwash containing Streptococcus salivarius K12 significantly reduced the levels of VSC-producing bacteria [45]. Burton et al. [46] concluded that the use of Streptococcus salivarius K12 as a probiotic, originally sourced from oral commensal bacteria, can play a pivotal role in the treatment of halitosis.
Protective mechanisms of probiotics in the oral cavity
The presence of beneficial microbiota or so-called probiotics in or on the human body has advantages, such as increased resistance against infections through antimicrobial activities (to produce organic acids and hydrogen peroxide and bacteriocins); creation of biolayers as a protective lining for oral tissues against infectious bacteria, competitive adhesion to dental surfaces with pathogenic bacteria; modulation of the pH and oxidation–reduction potential conditions; and differentiation and enhancing of the host cellular and humoral immune system (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG can prevent allergy in susceptible individuals) [41,47,48]. Enrichment of food products with probiotic strains (e.g. yogurt, butter, milk, kefir and cheese) can produce substances such as vitamins B6 and B12, riboflavin, folic acid, niacin and short-chain fatty acids (lactic acid, propionic acid). Collectively, these nutritional mixtures can assist in the improvement of gastrointestinal tract function or even halitosis [49]. About 70% of people worldwide are lactose intolerant and develop diarrhoea following consumption of milk. Probiotics Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus bulgaricus possess lactase enzymes, and their addition to milk can alleviate the clinical symptoms of lactose intolerance [50].
Probiotics and prophylaxis of dental caries
One of the causative factors of oral halitosis is dental caries. Dental caries (or tooth decay) is one of most common oral disease worldwide, and as a multifactorial disease is caused by oral pathogenic bacteria, which lead to acidic demineralization of enamel [51]. Different genera of bacteria can be used as probiotics. Nevertheless, the genera Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium are most frequently used as probiotic products. The useful Lactobacillus strains include L. acidophilus, L. johnsonii, L. casei, L. rhamnosus, L. gasseri and L. reuteri and the Bifidobacterium strains are represented by B. bifidum, B. longum and B. infantis [52]. Following oral consumption, these bacteria can be used as cariostatic probiotics in the prevention of dental caries. Based on dentistry studies, it has been demonstrated that consumption of bovine milk containing L. rhamnosus GG (LGG), and L. reuteri bacteria, significantly reduced the number of Streptococcus mutans and Streptococcus sobrinus, two of the main causative pathogens for dental caries. Fermentation of carbohydrates in the diet by Streptococcus spp. and decreased pH (from 7.0 to 4.0) of dental plaque lead to enamel demineralization. Hence, probiotic bacteria can be used as preventive bacteria in dairy products [53]. Conversely, some species of lactobacilli, such as L. salivarius LS1952R, show potentially cariogenic activity in animal (rat) models. Firm adherence to the hydroxylapatite on the tooth surface is an inherent ability of the probiotic bacterium L. salivarius LS1952R strain for cariogenic activity [54]. More recently, based on in vitro and in vivo experiments, it has been proved that Weissella cibaria (previously classified in the genus Lactobacillus) as a new probiotic strain can prevent dental caries and significantly inhibits the formation of biofilm by S. mutans. This bacterium produces a remarkable amount of hydrogen peroxide, and can congregate with F. nucleatum and inhibits the production of VSCs by these pathogens in the oral cavity [[55], [56], [57]] (Fig. 2). Briefly, many studies that were performed on the effectiveness of probiotics on cariogenic pathogens are listed in Table 3 [[58], [59], [60], [61], [62], [63], [64]].
Table 3.
Probiotic species (or strain) | Cariogenic pathogens | Ref. |
---|---|---|
Lactobacillus lactis NCC2211 | Streptococcus sobrinus OMZ176 | [58] |
Lactobacillus fermentum | Streptococcus mutans | [59] |
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG | S. mutans | [60] |
Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 | S. mutans | [61] |
Lactobacillus salivarius BGHO1 | S. mutans | [62] |
L. rhamnosus GG and Lactobacillus bulgaricus | Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum and streptococcal species | [63] |
Lactobacillus strains | S. mutans and P. gingivalis | [64] |
Probiotics as immunomodulators in periodontal diseases
Periodontal diseases (or gum diseases) are caused by bacteria, in particular, Gram-negative bacteria in dental plaque, and comprise the destructive inflammation of the gingiva (gingivitis) and supporting structures of the teeth (periodontitis). Periodontal lesions are only a consequence of morphological defects but are not a direct consequence of bacteria found in dental plaque [65]. Although at the onset of periodontal disease the bacterial infection is not responsible for true halitosis, if the periodontal disease is not treated, then persistent infections maintain oral conditions leading to halitosis [66]. Pro-inflammatory cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin-1β play a pivotal role in periodontal diseases, and it is demonstrated that commensal probiotics such as Lactobacillus bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophiles and Lactobacillus casei DN 114 001 enhance the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines in blood culture [67]. On the other hand, various studies have shown that the genus Lactobacillus (L. paracasei, L. plantarum, L. rhamnosus and L. salivarius) can inhibit the growth of periodontal pathogens such as Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans and Tannerella forsythia [68]. Schmitter et al. [69] showed that the positive potential anti-inflammatory effects of probiotic strains L. paracasei LPc-G110 (SYBIO-15) and L. plantarum GOS42 (SYBIO-41) on periodontal diseases were significantly dose-dependent and independent of their viability. In another study, which was performed by Twetman et al. [70], consumption of chewing gum containing L. reuteri as a probiotic could have an impressive effect on the reduction of the pro-inflammatory cytokines tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin-8 in the gingival crevicular fluid of volunteers with moderate levels of gingivitis and bacterial plaque. There are three possibilities for the protective effects of L. reuteri in periodontal diseases: first, the existence of two strong bacteriocins, reuterin and reutericyclin, which inhibit the growth of a wide range of pathogenic bacteria; second, the strong ability of L. reuteri to adhere to host tissues and compete with pathogens; and third, the known previous anti-inflammatory effects of this bacterium as an immunomodulator in gastrointestinal tract infections as an acceptable document for beneficial effects of L. reuteri in periodontal diseases [70]. The special defensive and immunomodulatory mechanisms of each oral probiotic against pathogens are listed in Table 4.
Table 4.
Probiotic species | Protective mechanism(s) | Ref. |
---|---|---|
Lactobacillus reuteri | Production of reuterin, reutericyclin Reduction of TNF-α, IL-1, IL-8 and IL-17 |
[71] |
Weissella cibaria | Inhibition of formation of biofilm by Streptococcus mutans Inhibition of production of VSCs by Fusobacterium nucleatum |
[72] |
Streptococcus salivarius K12 | Secretion of salivaricins A2 and B | [45] |
Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG | Adhesion to saliva-coated hydroxyapatite | [63] |
Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis | Inhibition of bone loss Inhibition of colonization of S. mutans in dental plaque |
[73] |
Bacillus subtilis | Inhibition of bone loss | [74] |
Bacillus licheniformis | Inhibition of bone loss | [74] |
Lactobacillus brevisCD2 | Inhibition of bone loss | [75] |
Lactobacillus rhamnosus ATCC 9595 | Inhibition of CXCL8 attenuation by Porphyromonas gingivalis Promote T helper type 1 and type 17 responses |
[76] |
Lactobacillus casei Shirota | Augmentation of natural killer cells activity through the induction of IL-12 production by monocytes/macrophages (anti-cancer) Inhibition of IL-6 |
[77] |
Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp bulgaricus | Anti-bacterial and anti-adherence effects | [78] |
Enterococcus durans | Reduction of TNF-α and IL-1β | [79] |
Pediococcus acidilactici UL5 | Production of pediocin PA-1 | [80] |
Leuconostoc mesenteroides B7 | Production of leucocin B | [81] |
Abbreviations: IL-1 interleukin-1; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α.
Conclusion
Today, the emergence of bacteria resistant to a wide range of antibiotics has become one of the main concerns of humans in combatting infectious diseases. For this reason, using an alternative method for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases is considered urgent. As noted previously, the occurrence of dysbiosis in the population of resident oral bacteria and the domination of pathogens over commensal flora lead to the development of pathological states such as periodontal diseases, dental plaque, caries and eventually oral halitosis. Based on many scientific studies, it is concluded that consumption of probiotics can be a better alternative to antibiotics for the alleviation of gastrointestinal disorders. Probably the best strategy for the prevention or even treatment of oral cavity diseases by probiotics is the identification and selection of probiotic bacteria according to the source of commensal microflora in the mouth. Probiotics have various advantages such as antimicrobial activities, powerful binding capacity, the formation of protective biolayers, neutralization of acidic pH, modulation of oxidation–reduction potential, augmentation of the immune system and reduction of pro-inflammatory cytokines. These qualities combined lead to the improvement of oral cavity disorders, and also to the prevention or amelioration of oral halitosis. Less than 10% of halitosis cases are related to extra-oral halitosis. This type of halitosis is derived from the blood and respiratory tract. The main factors of extra-oral halitosis are dimethyl sulphide and tuberculosis respectively from blood and lungs. The source of dimethyl sulphide is unknown, but the likely complete treatment of patients affected by tuberculosis has an impressive effect on the alleviation of extra-oral halitosis. However, before the use of probiotic therapy for periodontal diseases, several aspects of this type of treatment must be considered. These include (a) evaluation of length and mode of therapy for the prevention of reverting to dysbiotic status after treatment; (b) careful investigation of cariogenic probiotic strains during the treatment of periodontal diseases; and (c) complete supervision of the administration of probiotics in patients with mild to moderate immune suppression.
Conflict of interest
The authors have none to declare.
Funding
This research is not supported by a specific project grant.
Contributor Information
B. Yousefi, Email: yosefi_bahman@semums.ac.ir.
M. Eslami, Email: M.eslami@semums.ac.ir.
References
- 1.Yoneda M., Naito T., Suzuki N., Yoshikane T., Hirofuji T. Oral malodor associated with internal resorption. J Oral Sci. 2006;48:89–92. doi: 10.2334/josnusd.48.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hampelska K., Jaworska M.M., Babalska Z.Ł., Karpiński T.M. The role of oral microbiota in intra-oral halitosis. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2484. doi: 10.3390/jcm9082484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ratcliff P.A., Johnson P.W. The relationship between oral malodor, gingivitis, and periodontitis. A review. J Periodontol. 1999;70:485–489. doi: 10.1902/jop.1999.70.5.485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Fukamachi H., Nakano Y., Okano S., Shibata Y., Abiko Y., Yamashita Y. High production of methyl mercaptan by l-methionine-α-deamino-γ-mercaptomethane lyase from Treponema denticola. Biochem Biophys Res Comm. 2005;331:127–131. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.03.139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tonzetich J., McBride B.C. Characterization of volatile sulphur production by pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains of oral Bacteroides. Arch Oral Biol. 1981;26:963–969. doi: 10.1016/0003-9969(81)90104-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yaegaki K., Coil J.M. Examination, classification, and treatment of halitosis; clinical perspectives. J Canad Dental Assoc. 2000;66:257–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Murata T., Yamaga T., Iida T., Miyazaki H., Yaegaki K. Classification and examination of halitosis. Int Dental J. 2002;52(S5P1):181–186. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-595x.2002.tb00921.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Salminen S., von Wright A., Morelli L., Marteau P., Brassart D., de Vos W.M. Demonstration of safety of probiotics—a review. Int J Food Microbiol. 1998;44:93–106. doi: 10.1016/s0168-1605(98)00128-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Markowiak P., Śliżewska K. Effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on human health. Nutrients. 2017;9:1021. doi: 10.3390/nu9091021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pandey K.R., Naik S.R., Vakil B.V. Probiotics, prebiotics and synbiotics-a review. J Food Sci Technol. 2015;52:7577–7587. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-1921-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eslami M., Yousefi B., Kokhaei P., Moghadas A.J., Moghadam B.S., Arabkari V. Are probiotics useful for therapy of Helicobacter pylori diseases? Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;64:99–108. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2019.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Eslami M., Yousefi B., kokhaei P., arabkari V., Ghasemian A. Current information on the association of Helicobacter pylori with autophagy and gastric cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2019 doi: 10.1002/jcp.28279. epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kobyliak N., Falalyeyeva T., Beregova T., Spivak M. Probiotics for experimental obesity prevention: focus on strain dependence and viability of composition. Endokrynol Polska. 2017;68:659–667. doi: 10.5603/EP.a2017.0055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kobyliak N., Abenavoli L., Falalyeyeva T., Beregova T. Efficacy of probiotics and smectite in rats with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Ann Hepatol. 2018;17:153–161. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0010.7547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kobyliak N., Falalyeyeva T., Bodnar P., Beregova T. Probiotics supplemented with omega-3 fatty acids are more effective for hepatic steatosis reduction in an animal model of obesity. Probiot Antimicrob Proteins. 2017;9:123–130. doi: 10.1007/s12602-016-9230-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hemmati M., Yousefi B., Bahar A., Eslami M. Importance of heme oxygenase-1 in gastrointestinal cancers: functions, inductions, regulations, and signaling. J Gastroint Cancer. 2021:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s12029-021-00587-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Farrokhi A.S., Mohammadlou M., Abdollahi M., Eslami M., Yousefi B. Histone deacetylase modifications by probiotics in colorectal cancer. J Gastroint Cancer. 2019:1–11. doi: 10.1007/s12029-019-00338-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yousefi B., Mohammadlou M., Abdollahi M., Salek Farrokhi A., Karbalaei M., Keikha M. Epigenetic changes in gastric cancer induction by Helicobacter pylori. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:21770–21784. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28925. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Fijan S. Microorganisms with claimed probiotic properties: an overview of recent literature. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11:4745–4767. doi: 10.3390/ijerph110504745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Poorni S., Srinivasan M.R., Nivedhitha M.S. Probiotic Streptococcus strains in caries prevention: a systematic review. J Conserv Dentistry. 2019;22:123. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_505_18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Rossoni R.D., de Barros P.P., de Alvarenga J.A., Ribeiro FdC., Velloso MdS., Fuchs B.B. Antifungal activity of clinical Lactobacillus strains against Candida albicans biofilms: identification of potential probiotic candidates to prevent oral candidiasis. Biofouling. 2018;34:212–225. doi: 10.1080/08927014.2018.1425402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bustamante M., Oomah B.D., Mosi-Roa Y., Rubilar M., Burgos-Díaz C. Probiotics as an adjunct therapy for the treatment of halitosis, dental caries and periodontitis. Probiot Antimicrob Proteins. 2020;12:325–334. doi: 10.1007/s12602-019-9521-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sales-Campos H., Soares S.C., Oliveira C.J.F. An introduction of the role of probiotics in human infections and autoimmune diseases. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2019;45:413–432. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2019.1621261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Magno M.B., Nadelman P., de Abreu Brandi T.C., Pithon M.M., Fonseca-Gonçalves A., da Cruz A.G. The effect of dairy probiotic beverages on oral health. In: Grumezescu A., Holban A.M., editors. Milk-based beverages. Elsevier; Amsterdam: 2019. pp. 521–556. vol. 9. [Google Scholar]
- 25.Settineri S., Mento C., Gugliotta S.C., Saitta A., Terranova A., Trimarchi G. Self-reported halitosis and emotional state: impact on oral conditions and treatments. Health Qual Life Outcome. 2010;8:34. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Silva M.F., Leite F.R., Ferreira L.B., Pola N.M., Scannapieco F.A., Demarco F.F. Estimated prevalence of halitosis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Clin Oral Invest. 2018;22:47–55. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2164-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Petersen P.E., Ogawa H. The global burden of periodontal disease: towards integration with chronic disease prevention and control. Periodontol 2000. 2012;60:15–39. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2011.00425.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Aylıkcı B.U., Çolak H. Halitosis: from diagnosis to management. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013;4:14. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.107255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Eslami M., Sadrifar S., Karbalaei M., Keikha M., Kobyliak N.M., Yousefi B. Importance of the microbiota inhibitory mechanism on the Warburg effect in colorectal cancer cells. J Gastroint Cancer. 2019;51:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s12029-019-00329-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Veeresha K.L., Bansal M., Bansal V. Halitosis: a frequently ignored social condition. J Int Soc Prevent Commun Dentistry. 2011;1:9–13. doi: 10.4103/2231-0762.86374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Appanna V.D. Human Microbes-The Power Within. Springer; Stuttgart: 2018. Dysbiosis, probiotics, and prebiotics: in diseases and health; pp. 81–122. vol. 6. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Salek Farrokhi A., Darabi N., Yousefi B., Askandar R.H., Shariati M., Eslami M. Is it true that gut microbiota is considered as panacea in cancer therapy? J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:14941–14950. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Madhushankari G., Yamunadevi A., Selvamani M., Kumar K.M., Basandi P.S. Halitosis – an overview: Part-I–Classification, etiology, and pathophysiology of halitosis. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2015;7(Suppl. 2):S339. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.163441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cortelli J.R., Barbosa M.D.S., Westphal M.A. Halitosis: a review of associated factors and therapeutic approach. Braz Oral Res. 2008;22:44–54. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242008000500007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kotti A.B., Subramanyam R. Oral malodor: a review of etiology and pathogenesis. J Dr NTR Univ Health Sci. 2015;4:1. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Aylıkcı B.U., Colak H. Halitosis: from diagnosis to management. J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2013;4:14–23. doi: 10.4103/0976-9668.107255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Haraszthy V.I., Zambon J.J., Sreenivasan P.K., Zambon M.M., Gerber D., Rego R. Identification of oral bacterial species associated with halitosis. J Am Dental Assoc. 2007;138:1113–1120. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2007.0325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sharma P., Thippeswamy H., Chandrasekar B., Thetakala R.K. Oral halitosis and probiotics. TMU J Dent. 2015;2:62–66. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Burton J., Chilcott C., Moore C., Speiser G., Tagg J. A preliminary study of the effect of probiotic Streptococcus salivarius K12 on oral malodour parameters. J Appl Microbiol. 2006;100:754–764. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02837.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Tangerman A., Winkel E.G. Intra- and extra-oral halitosis: finding of a new form of extra-oral blood-borne halitosis caused by dimethyl sulphide. J Clin Periodontol. 2007;34:748–755. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01116.x. PubMed PMID: 17716310. Epub 2007/08/25. eng. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Eslami M., Bahar A., Hemati M., Rasouli Nejad Z., Mehranfar F., Karami S. Dietary pattern, colonic microbiota and immunometabolism interaction: new frontiers for diabetes mellitus and related disorders. Diabet Med. 2021;38:e14415. doi: 10.1111/dme.14415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Keikha M., Eslami M., Yousefi B., Ghasemian A., Karbalaei M. Potential antigen candidates for subunit vaccine development against Helicobacter pylori infection. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:21460–21470. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Peterson J., Garges S., Giovanni M., McInnes P., Wang L., Schloss J.A. The NIH human microbiome project. Genome Res. 2009;19:2317–2323. doi: 10.1101/gr.096651.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Yousefi B., Eslami M., Ghasemian A., Kokhaei P., Sadeghnejhad A. Probiotics can really cure an autoimmune disease? Gene Rep. 2019:100364. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hyink O., Wescombe P.A., Upton M., Ragland N., Burton J.P., Tagg J.R. Salivaricin A2 and the novel lantibiotic salivaricin B are encoded at adjacent loci on a 190-kilobase transmissible megaplasmid in the oral probiotic strain Streptococcus salivarius K12. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:1107–1113. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02265-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Burton J., Chilcott C., Tagg J. The rationale and potential for the reduction of oral malodour using Streptococcus salivarius probiotics. Oral Dis. 2005;11:29–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01084.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Eslami M., Yousefi B., Kokhaei P., Hemati M., Nejad Z.R., Arabkari V. Importance of probiotics in the prevention and treatment of colorectal cancer. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:17127–17143. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Karbalaei M., Keikha M., Yousefi B., Ali-Hassanzadeh M., Eslami M. Contribution of aging oral microbiota in getting neurodegenerative diseases. Rev Med Microbiol. 2021;32:90–94. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ghasemian A., Eslami M., Shafiei M., Najafipour S., Rajabi A. Probiotics and their increasing importance in human health and infection control. Rev Med Microbiol. 2018;29:153–158. [Google Scholar]
- 50.Guarner F., Perdigon G., Corthier G., Salminen S., Koletzko B., Morelli L. Should yoghurt cultures be considered probiotic? Br J Nutr. 2005;93:783–786. doi: 10.1079/bjn20051428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Selwitz R.H., Ismail A.I., Pitts N.B. Dental caries. Lancet. 2007;369(9555):51–59. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Meurman J., Stamatova I. Probiotics: contributions to oral health. Oral Dis. 2007;13:443–451. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01386.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nikawa H., Makihira S., Fukushima H., Nishimura H., Ozaki Y., Ishida K. Lactobacillus reuteri in bovine milk fermented decreases the oral carriage of mutans streptococci. Int J Food Microbiol. 2004;95:219–223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Matsumoto M., Tsuji M., Sasaki H., Fujita K., Nomura R., Nakano K. Cariogenicity of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus salivarius in rats. Caries Res. 2005;39:479–483. doi: 10.1159/000088183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Singh V.P., Sharma J., Babu S., Rizwanulla S.A., Singla A. Role of probiotics in health and disease: a review. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63:253–257. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Kang M.S., Kim B.G., Chung J., Lee H.C., Oh J.S. Inhibitory effect of Weissella cibaria isolates on the production of volatile sulphur compounds. J Clin Periodont. 2006;33:226–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2006.00893.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kobyliak N., Falalyeyeva T., Tsyryuk O., Eslami M., Kyriienko D., Beregova T. New insights on strain-specific impacts of probiotics on insulin resistance: evidence from animal study. J Diabet Metabol Disord. 2020;19:1–8. doi: 10.1007/s40200-020-00506-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Comelli E.M., Guggenheim B., Stingele F., Neeser J.R. Selection of dairy bacterial strains as probiotics for oral health. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002;110:218–224. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.21216.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chung J., Ha E.S., Park H.R., Kim S. Isolation and characterization of Lactobacillus species inhibiting the formation of Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2004;19:214–216. doi: 10.1111/j.0902-0055.2004.00137.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Näse L., Hatakka K., Savilahti E., Saxelin M., Pönkä A., Poussa T. Effect of long–term consumption of a probiotic bacterium, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, in milk on dental caries and caries risk in children. Caries Res. 2001;35:412–420. doi: 10.1159/000047484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Caglar E., Cildir S.K., Ergeneli S., Sandalli N., Twetman S. Salivary mutans streptococci and lactobacilli levels after ingestion of the probiotic bacterium Lactobacillus reuteri ATCC 55730 by straws or tablets. Acta Odontol Scand. 2006;64:314–318. doi: 10.1080/00016350600801709. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Strahinic I., Busarcevic M., Pavlica D., Milasin J., Golic N., Topisirovic L. Molecular and biochemical characterizations of human oral lactobacilli as putative probiotic candidates. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2007;22:111–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2007.00331.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Stamatova I., Kari K., Vladimirov S., Meurman J. In vitro evaluation of yoghurt starter lactobacilli and Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG adhesion to saliva-coated surfaces. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2009;24:218–223. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2008.00498.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Koll-Klais P., Mandar R., Leibur E., Marcotte H., Hammarstrom L., Mikelsaar M. Oral lactobacilli in chronic periodontitis and periodontal health: species composition and antimicrobial activity. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2005;20:354–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-302X.2005.00239.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Pelekos G., Tse J.M., Ho D., Tonetti M.S. Defect morphology, bone thickness, exposure settings and examiner experience affect the diagnostic accuracy of standardized digital periapical radiographic images but not of cone beam computed tomography in the detection of peri-implant osseous defects: an in vitro study. J Clin Periodontol. 2019;46:1294–1302. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Yousefi B., Eslami M., Ghasemian A., Kokhaei P., Salek Farrokhi A., Darabi N. Probiotics importance and their immunomodulatory properties. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234:8008–8018. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Meyer A.L., Elmadfa I., Herbacek I., Micksche M. Probiotic, as well as conventional yogurt, can enhance the stimulated production of proinflammatory cytokines. J Hum Nutr Dietet. 2007;20:590–598. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-277X.2007.00807.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Laleman I., Yilmaz E., Ozcelik O., Haytac C., Pauwels M., Herrero E.R. The effect of a streptococci containing probiotic in periodontal therapy: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42:1032–1041. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.12464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Schmitter T., Fiebich B.L., Fischer J.T., Gajfulin M., Larsson N., Rose T. Ex vivo anti-inflammatory effects of probiotics for periodontal health. J Oral Microbiol. 2018;10:1502027. doi: 10.1080/20002297.2018.1502027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bonifait L., Chandad F., Grenier D. Probiotics for oral health: myth or reality? J Can Dental Assoc. 2009;75:585–590. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Twetman S., Derawi B., Keller M., Ekstrand K., Yucel-Lindberg T., Stecksen-Blicks C. Short-term effect of chewing gums containing probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri on the levels of inflammatory mediators in gingival crevicular fluid. Acta Odontol Scand. 2009;67:19–24. doi: 10.1080/00016350802516170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Jang H.-J., Kang M.-S., Yi S.-H., Hong J.-Y., Hong S.-P. Comparative study on the characteristics of Weissella cibaria CMU and probiotic strains for oral care. Molecules. 2016;21:1752. doi: 10.3390/molecules21121752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Oliveira L.F., Salvador S.L., Silva P.H., Furlaneto F.A., Figueiredo L., Casarin R. Benefits of Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis probiotic in experimental periodontitis. J Periodontol. 2017;88:197–208. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Messora M.R., Pereira L.J., Foureaux R., Oliveira L.F., Sordi C.G., Alves A.J. Favourable effects of Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis on experimental periodontitis in rats. Arch Oral Biol. 2016;66:108–119. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2016.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Maekawa T., Hajishengallis G. Topical treatment with probiotic Lactobacillus brevis CD 2 inhibits experimental periodontal inflammation and bone loss. J Periodont Res. 2014;49:785–791. doi: 10.1111/jre.12164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Mendi A., Köse S., Uçkan D., Akca G., Yilmaz D., Aral L. Lactobacillus rhamnosus could inhibit Porphyromonas gingivalis derived CXCL8 attenuation. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016;24:67–75. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720150145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Shida K., Nomoto K. Probiotics as efficient immunopotentiators: translational role in cancer prevention. Ind J Med Res. 2013;138:808. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Abedi D., Feizizadeh S., Akbari V., Jafarian-Dehkordi A. In vitro anti-bacterial and anti-adherence effects of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp bulgaricus on Escherichia coli. Res Pharm Sci. 2013;8:260. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Raz I., Gollop N., Polak-Charcon S., Schwartz B. Isolation and characterisation of new putative probiotic bacteria from human colonic flora. Br J Nutr. 2007;97:725–734. doi: 10.1017/S000711450747249X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Fernandez B., Hammami R., Savard P., Jean J., Fliss I. Pediococcus acidilactici UL 5 and Lactococcus lactis ATCC 11454 are able to survive and express their bacteriocin genes under simulated gastrointestinal conditions. J Appl Microbiol. 2014;116:677–688. doi: 10.1111/jam.12391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Benmechernene Z., Chentouf H.F., Yahia B., Fatima G., Quintela-Baluja M., Calo-Mata P. Technological aptitude and applications of Leuconostoc mesenteroides bioactive strains isolated from Algerian raw camel milk. BioMed Res Int. 2013;2013 doi: 10.1155/2013/418132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]