Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 3;42(7):5922–5938. doi: 10.1007/s12144-021-01941-y

Table 2.

Wrongness ratings of scenarios and their correlations with MFQ-scores

Scenario codes Mean wrongness (SD) Correlations between wrongness ratings and MFQ-dimensions
Care Fairness Liberty Loyalty Authority Purity
Care1 – Type A 3.92 (1.02) .02 .02 .04 −.01 −.02 .05
Care1 – Type B 4.10 (.92) .04 .02 −.02 .00 .01 .07
Care1 – Type C 4.54 (.69) .07 .06 .02 −.03 −.04 .00
Care2 – Type A 2.83 (1.09) .02 .00 −.07 .02 .06 .08
Care2 – Type B 3.65 (.96) −.01 −.02 .12* −.13** −.10* −.09
Care2 – Type C 4.58 (.69) .15** .04 .13** −.03 −.10 .05
Fairness1 – Type A 4.27 (.89) .07 .13** −.05 −.07 −.07 .01
Fairness1 – Type B 4.38 (.81) .12* .18** −.03 −.07 −.11* .02
Fairness1 – Type C 4.07 (.90) .09 .11* −.01 −.02 .00 .11*
Fairness2 – Type A 4.70 (.69) .18** .07 .04 .03 −.04 .01
Fairness2 – Type B 4.62 (.72) .16** .06 .08 .10 −.02 .01
Fairness2 – Type C 4.51 (.84) .09 .02 −.05 .09 .02 .12*
Liberty1 – Type A 1.76 (.83) −.07 −.10* −.05 .01 −.04 .01
Liberty1 – Type B 2.60 (1.08) −.13* −.11* −.03 −.14** −.11* −.03
Liberty1 – Type C 4.65 (.68) .17** .20** .35** −.16** −.31** −.25**
Liberty2 – Type A 2.84 (1.29) −.03 −.06 −.10* .02 −.02 .08
Liberty2 – Type B 2.34 (1.09) −.03 −.06 .02 −.00 −.03 −.02
Liberty2 – Type C 4.39 (.94) .19** .08 .38** −.13** −.26** −.25**
Loyalty1 – Type A 2.79 (1.28) .05 −.08 −.19** .30** .30** .31**
Loyalty1 – Type B 2.34 (1.22) .09 −.10 −.22** .31** .30** .31**
Loyalty1 – Type C 3.23 (1.27) .09 −.04 −.20** .33** .28** .34**
Loyalty2 – Type A 2.21 (1.03) .06 .04 −.07 .19** .23** .19**
Loyalty2 – Type B 2.41 (1.11) .06 −.01 −.0.09 .21** .19** .22**
Loyalty2 – Type C 3.03 (1.19) .20** .05 −.17** .24** .28** .29**
Authority1 – Type A 2.34 (1.06) −.17** −.11* −.23** .10* .18** .13**
Authority 1 – Type B 2.55 (1.08) −.03 −.11* −.13** .06 .13* .19**
Authority 1 – Type C 3.67 (.90) .05 .01 −.07 .13* .19* .15**
Authority 2 – Type A 1.61 (.89) −.11* −.17** −.19** .21** .22** .20**
Authority 2 – Type B 2.12 (1.06) −.11* −.12* −.22** .17** .21** .20**
Authority 2 – Type C 3.90 (.91) .15** .01 −.05 .25** .27** .19**
Purity1 – Type A 3.67 (1.41) .06 −.05 −.26** .35** .41** .46**
Purity1 – Type B 3.90 (1.34) .09 −.04 −.34** .42** .43** .56**
Purity1 – Type C 4.36 (1.06) .08 .05 −.25** .41** .36** .44**
Purity2 – Type A 3.55 (1.33) .15** .04 −.17** .47** .44** .35**
Purity2 – Type B 3.55 (1.31) .14** .03 −.20** .50** .48** .35**
Purity2 – Type C 4.09 (1.11) .08 .01 −.15** .45** .43** .32**

Notes. Wrongness ratings of the scenarios and their correlations with MFQ-dimensions were computed in the main analysis set (N = 396). SD = Standard deviation. ** p < .01, * p < .05