Skip to main content
. 2021 Jul;212:104697. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104697

Table 1.

Illustration of a p × p sized cue-to-outcome network with p cues and p outcomes, in which spectral components (sc) are used as cues (rows) and outcomes (columns). spectral components are grouped to k frequency bands (B), with m spectral components within each frequency band (m may vary by frequency band). Each u-th spectral component cue is associated with each v-th outcome by a weight wu, v, representing their connection strength, where u = 1, 2, …, p and v = 1, 2, …, p. The table demonstrates the calculation of the jth by-frequency band activation for a target and a competitor, where a hypothetical target stimulus has the spectral components sc1, 1, sc1, 3 and sc2, 1, and a hypothetical competitor stimulus has the spectral components sc1, 2, sc2, 2, sc2, 3. Cells marked in dark blue represent the afferent weights between the target's cues and the target's outcomes. Cells marked in dark red represent the afferent weights between the competitor's cues and the target's outcomes. The bottom lines represent the by-frequency band activation vectors a for the target and the competitor, with activations aj representing the summed weights between cues and outcomes, as calculated in Eq. 4.



B1
B2

Bk
sc1, 1 sc1, 2 sc1, 3 sc2, 1 sc2, 2 sc2, 3 ... sck, m
Target sc1, 1 w1, 1 w1, 2 w1, 3 w1, 4 w1, 5 w1, 6 ... w1, v
Competitor sc1, 2 w2, 1 w2, 2 w2, 3 w2, 4 w2, 5 w2, 6 ... w2, v
Target sc1, 3 w3, 1 w3, 2 w3, 3 w3, 4 w3, 5 w3, 6 ... w3, v
Target sc2, 1 w4, 1 w4, 2 w4, 3 w4, 4 w4, 5 w4, 6 ... w4, v
Competitor sc2, 2 w5, 1 w5, 2 w5, 3 w5, 4 w5, 5 w5, 6 ... w5, v
Competitor sc2, 3 w6, 1 w6, 2 w6, 3 w6, 4 w6, 5 w6, 6 ... w6, v
... ... ... ... ... ... ... ...
sck, m wu, 1 wu, 2 wu, 3 wu, 4 wu, 5 wu, 6 ... wp, p
Target activation a1 a2 ... ak
Competitor activation a1 a2 ... ak