Skip to main content
. 2021 May 6;94(1122):20210315. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210315

Table 1.

TimeTRIG, TimeSD, and Scan Delay Ratio between scan timing adequacy

All patients (n = 114) Early (n = 16) Appropriate (n = 76) Late (n = 22) p value
TimeTRIG (s) 16.4 ± 2.5 (11.1–23.4) 16.9 ± 2.5 (12.7–23.3) 16.6 ± 2.4 (12.1–23.4) 14.0 ± 1.5 (11.1–17.2) <0.001
TimeSD (s) 16.8 ± 3.2 (5.8–21.1) 11.3 ± 3.0 (5.8–20.3) 17.5 ± 2.5 (10.1–21.1) 18.5 ± 0.8 (16.8–19.9) <0.001
SDR 1.1 ± 0.3 (0.3–1.6) 0.7 ± 0.2 (0.3–1.1) 1.1 ± 0.2 (0.7–1.5) 1.3 ± 0.1 (1.0–1.6) <0.001

SDR, scan delay ratio.

Note. TimeTRIG = the time from contrast material injection to the bolus-tracking trigger of 100 HU at the abdominal aorta. TimeSD = the scan delay from the bolus-tracking trigger of 100 HU to the initiation of late hepatic arterial or pancreatic parenchyma phase scan.

Data are means ± 1 standard deviation with ranges in parentheses.