Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 4;88(6):819–829. doi: 10.2319/022018-135.1

Table 5.

Summary of Diagnostic Efficacy of PR for Different SRR Types

Item
Type I
Type II
Type III
Type IV
Sen [95% CI] 0.75 [0.65–0.83] 0.55 [0.47–0.63] 0.17 [0.07–0.37] 0.86 [0.77–0.92]
Spe [95% CI] 0.97 [0.94–0.98] 0.88 [0.83–0.92] 0.93 [0.89–0.96] 0.76 [0.67–0.82]
+LR [95% CI] 22.9 [11.5–45.7] 4.7 [3.1–7.2] 2.5 [0.8–7.4] 3.5 [2.6–4.9]
−LR [95% CI] 0.26 [0.17–0.37] 0.51 [0.42–0.62] 0.89 [0.74–1.08] 0.18 [0.10–0.31]
AUC [95% CI] 0.95 [0.93–0.97] 0.78 [0.75–0.82] 0.83 [0.79–0.86] 0.87 [0.84–0.90]
DOR [95% CI] 90 [35–229] 9 [5–16] 3 [1–10] 20 [9–42]
a 

CI indicates confidence interval; Sen, sensitivity; Spe, specificity; +LR, positive likelihood ratio; −LR, negative likelihood ratio; AUC, area under the curve; DOR, diagnostic odds ratio.