Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. 2021 Mar 25;99(6):skab080. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab080

Table 6.

Relative abundance of fecal bacterial phyla and families of adult dogs fed diets containing selected carbohydrate sources

		Treatment¹
Phyla, % sequences	Family	CON	AM	WPM	QU	OG	SEM
Bacteroidetes		20.66^ab	23.58^ab	22.62^ab	27.96^a	18.58^b	2.519
	Bacteroidaceae	14.79^bc	16.12^ab	13.23^bc	20.01^a	10.83^c	1.39
	Tannerellaceae	0.78^b	0.74^b	1.42^ab	1.57^a	0.83^b	0.302
Firmicutes		32.64^b	40.03^b	38.16^b	34.99^b	52.21^a	3.413
	Lactobacillaceae	0.32^b	0.98^ab	0.55^ab	0.10^b	2.48^a	0.672
	Streptococcaceae	0.23^ab	0.93^ab	0.29^ab	0.11^b	1.48^a	0.346
	Lachnospiraceae	15.26^y	16.65^xy	17.17^xy	17.62^y	22.76^x	1.873
	Erysipelotrichaceae	4.41^b	5.25^b	5.71^ab	3.95^b	8.07^a	0.728
	Veillonellaceae	0.58^bc	2.39^a	0.55^bc	0.13^c	1.68^ab	0.393
Fusobacteria		40.03^a	29.57^b	32.13^ab	31.83^ab	23.52^b	2.847
	Fusobacteriaceae	40.03^a	29.57^b	32.13^ab	31.83^ab	23.52^b	2.847

¹CON, control; AM, amaranth; WPM, white proso millet.

^a–cMeans in the same row without common superscript letters are different (P < 0.05).

^x,yMeans in the same row without common superscript letters are different (P < 0.10).