Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 25;99(6):skab080. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab080

Table 7.

Relative abundance of fecal bacterial genera of adult dogs fed diets containing selected carbohydrate sources

Treatment1
Phyla, % sequences Genus CON AM WPM QU OG SEM
Bacteroidetes Bacteroides 14.79bc 16.12ab 13.23bc 20.01a 10.83c 1.390
Prevotella 9 0.53b 2.52a 2.06ab 1.79ab 2.46a 0.691
Parabacteroides 0.78ab 0.74b 1.42ab 1.57a 0.83ab 0.302
Firmicutes Lactobacillus 0.32b 0.98ab 0.55ab 0.10b 2.48a 0.672
Streptococcus 0.23b 0.93ab 0.29ab 0.11b 1.48a 0.346
Lachnoclostridium 1.34a 0.11c 0.93ab 0.41bc 0.27bc 0.223
Lachnospira 0.07b 0.05b 0.00b 1.65a 0.00b 0.124
Lachnospiraceae, undefined 7.28b 8.58b 9.02b 9.43ab 13.51a 1.226
Romboutsia 0.93bc 1.74ab 1.31abc 0.88c 1.97a 0.256
Erysipelotrichaceae UCG-003 0.15b 0.60ab 0.27b 0.00b 1.90a 0.384
Firmicutes Holdemanella 0.15b 0.70ab 0.63ab 0.96a 0.66ab 0.219
Turicibacter 0.14b 0.80a 0.52ab 0.14b 0.52ab 0.132
Megamonas 0.58bc 2.32a 0.55bc 0.13c 1.68ab 0.381
Fusobacteria Fusobacterium 40.03a 29.57b 32.13ab 31.83ab 23.52b 2.847

1CON, control; AM, amaranth; WPM, white proso millet.

a–cMeans in the same row without common superscript letters are different (P < 0.05).