Skip to main content
. 2021 Apr 15;65(4):302–308. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_495_20

Table 4.

Comparison of radial and femoral pressures at specific time points during surgery

Time points Femoral MAP mmHg Radial MAP mmHg ICC
T1 80.12±11.76 83.94±11.20 0.866* (0.765, 0.924)
T2 78.04±10.08 83.66±9.46 0.824* (0.691, 0.900)
T3 78.47±10.72 82.87±11.22 0.849* (0.616, 0.929)
T4 49.38±15.34 56.51±14.83 0.833* (0.761, 0.885)
T5 73.03±9.96 79.1±12.69 0.751* (0.481, 0.881)

Time points Femoral SAP mmHg Radial SAP mmHg ICC

T1 114.96±16.49 120.16±17.42 0.889* (0.806, 0.882)
T2 111.28±12.24 118.5±13.50 0.714 (0.498, 0.837)
T3 112.75±15.96 121.27±15.33 0.738 (0.536, 0.853)
T4 69.44±25.42 94.07±21.48 0.343 (0.153, 0.508)
T5 106.096±16.79 116.68±15.89 0.677 (0.335, 0.843)

ICC; ≥0.75 – High agreement; 0.4-0.74 – Moderate agreement; <0.4 – Poor agreement. *High levels of agreement, P<0.05 versus preceding value. Values in parentheses are 95% CIs. T1 – Baseline; T2 – 1 h in dissection phase; T 3 – Start of portocaval shunt; T4 – Reperfusion point; T5 – Bile duct anastomosis; CI – Confidence interval; ICC – Intraclass correlation; MAP – Mean arterial pressure; SAP – Systolic arterial pressure