Skip to main content
. 2021 Jun 3;16(6):e0251920. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251920

Table 2. Stability of reference gene expression under different experimental conditions calculated by four different analytical tools.

Experimental conditions Reference genes ΔCt Bestkeeper NormFinder geNorm Recommendation
Stability Rank Stability Rank Stability Rank Stability Rank
Development stage Actin1 0.628 3 0.337 2 0.259 4 0.528 5 TBP
Actin2 0.706 6 0.343 3 0.364 6 0.554 6
EF-1α 0.641 4 0.230 1 0.306 5 0.420 3
GAPDH 0.970 8 0.845 8 0.608 8 0.700 8
α-TUB 0.837 7 0.469 6 0.511 7 0.611 7 RPL19
RPL19 0.588 2 0.408 4 0.188 1 0.336 1
RPL32 0.647 5 0.536 7 0.257 3 0.498 4
TBP 0.585 1 0.432 5 0.191 2 0.336 1
Tissue Actin1 1.157 7 0.567 5 0.744 7 0.694 5 EF-1α
Actin2 1.134 6 0.456 4 0.723 6 0.860 6
EF-1α 0.782 1 0.405 3 0.197 1 0.180 1
GAPDH 1.204 8 1.091 8 0.795 8 1.006 8
α-TUB 1.023 5 0.889 7 0.596 5 0.942 7 RPL32
RPL19 0.930 3 0.091 1 0.348 3 0.600 4
RPL32 0.863 2 0.356 2 0.260 2 0.458 3
TBP 0.969 4 0.829 6 0.496 4 0.180 1
Temperature Actin1 0.904 6 0.983 6 0.450 6 0.603 5 RPL32
Actin2 0.882 4 0.988 7 0.424 5 0.576 4
EF-1α 0.896 5 0.611 3 0.411 4 0.661 6
GAPDH 1.398 8 1.575 8 0.894 8 0.922 8 TBP
α-TUB 0.795 3 0.664 5 0.303 3 0.464 3
RPL19 1.084 7 0.288 1 0.647 7 0.763 7
RPL32 0.692 1 0.601 2 0.022 1 0.354 1
TBP 0.722 2 0.655 4 0.137 2 0.354 1
Insecticide Actin1 1.479 8 1.177 7 0.939 8 1.034 8 RPL19
Actin2 0.996 5 0.812 6 0.445 4 0.767 6
EF-1α 0.990 4 0.362 2 0.532 6 0.394 1
GAPDH 1.154 7 1.181 8 0.615 7 0.886 7
α-TUB 0.885 3 0.691 5 0.314 2 0.700 5 RPL32
RPL19 0.876 1 0.482 3 0.359 3 0.394 1
RPL32 0.884 2 0.535 4 0.281 1 0.655 4
TBP 1.009 6 0.331 1 0.510 5 0.591 3