Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 27;320(5):L661–L679. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.00520.2020

Table 2.

Biomarkers of systemic toxicity in ENDS/e-cig exposure

Sample Matrix (Metabolite/Biomarker) Methods Used for Analysis of Biomarkers Groups (n/Group) Results Summary of Key Findings Citation
Inflammatory biomarkers: cytokines and chemokines
IL-1β
 Saliva ELISA Nonsmokers (n = 26);
E-cig users (n = 22).
N/A Significantly higher levels in e-cig users vs. nonsmokers. (6)
 BALF V-PLEX Plus Proinflammatory Combo 10 Panel (Meso Scale Discovery) Never-smokers (n = 42);
E-cig users (n = 15);
Smokers (n = 16).
Means ± SD = 0.82 ± 0.39 pg/mL
Means ± SD = 1.51 ± 1.48 pg/mL
Means ± SD = 6.08 ± 5.37 pg/mL
Significantly higher levels in e-cig users vs. never-smokers.Significantly higher levels in smokers vs. e-cig users. (7)
 BALF Bead-based ELISA (Meso Scale Discovery) Never-smokers (n = 12);
E-cig users (n = 15);
Smokers (n = 16).
N/A Significantly higher levels in smokers vs. both e-cig users and nonsmokers. (7)
IL-6
 Plasma XL Cytokine Discovery Magnetic Luminex Panel (R&D Systems) Nonsmokers (n = 26);
E-cig users (n = 22).
N/A Significantly higher levels in e-cig users vs. nonsmokers. (6)
 BALF V-PLEX Plus Proinflammatory Combo 10 Panel (Meso Scale Discovery) Never-smokers (n = 42);
E-cig users (n = 15);
Smokers (n = 16).
Means ± SD = 0.99 ± 0.56 pg/mL
Means ± SD = 1.56 ± 1.02 pg/mL
Means ± SD = 4.21 ± 4.93 pg/mL
Significantly higher levels in e-cig users vs. never-smokers. (7)
 Serum Luminex (magnetic bead kit) Nonsmokers (n = 5);
E-cig users (n = 2);
Smokers (n = 5).
N/A Significantly higher levels in e-cig users and smokers 3 h after vaping or smoking, respectively, relative to prior levels. (38)
 Alveolar macrophages ELISA (Biotechne) Never-smokers (n = 8) N/A Significantly higher levels after treatment with 0.5% ECVC (with or without nicotine) vs. controls. (39)
IL-8 (CXCL8)
 Plasma XL Cytokine Discovery Magnetic Luminex Panel (R&D Systems) Nonsmokers (n = 26);
E-cig users (n = 22).
N/A Significantly higher levels in e-cig users vs. nonsmokers. (6)
 Alveolar macrophages ELISA (Biotechne) Never-smokers (n = 8) N/A Significantly higher levels after treatment with 0.5% ECVC (with or without nicotine) vs. controls. (39)
 Neutrophils ELISA (R&D Systems) Never-smokers (n = 10) N/A Significantly higher levels after 6-h exposure to 0.003% ECVE vs. controls. (40)
IL-13
 Plasma XL Cytokine Discovery Magnetic Luminex Panel (R&D Systems) Nonsmokers (n = 26);
E-cig users (n = 22).
N/A Significantly higher levels in e-cig users vs. nonsmokers. (6)
ICAM-1
 Serum Luminex (magnetic bead kit) Nonsmokers (n = 5);
E-cig users (n = 2);
Smokers (n = 5).
N/A Significantly higher levels in e-cig users and smokers 3 h after vaping or smoking relative to prior levels. (38)
MCP-1
 Serum Luminex (magnetic bead kit) Nonsmokers (n = 5);
E-cig users (n = 2);
Smokers (n = 5).
N/A Significantly higher levels after treatment with 0.05% ECVC (with nicotine) vs. controls. (38)
 Alveolar macrophages ELISA (Biotechne) Never-smokers (n = 8) N/A Significantly higher after treatment with 0.5% ECVC vs. control. (39)
MCSF
 Serum Luminex (magnetic bead kit) Nonsmokers (n = 5);
E-cig users (n = 2);
Smokers (n = 5).
N/A Significantly higher levels in e-cig users and smokers 3 h after vaping or smoking relative to prior levels. (38)
Inflammatory proteases
MMP-2
 BALF Western blot normalized to albumin Nonsmokers (n = 14);
E-cig users (n = 14);
Smokers (n = 14).
N/A Significantly higher levels in both e-cig users and smokers vs. nonsmokers. (2)
MMP-9
 Plasma Custom 9-plex Magnetic Luminex Assay (R&D Systems) Nonsmokers (n = 26);
E-cig users (n = 22).
N/A Significantly higher levels in e-cig users vs. nonsmokers. (6)
 BALF Western blot normalized to albumin Nonsmokers (n = 14);
E-cig users (n = 14);
Smokers (n = 14).
N/A Significantly higher levels in both e-cig users and smokers vs. nonsmokers.No difference between e-cig users and smokers. (2)
 Alveolar macrophages ELISA (Biotechne) Never-smokers (n = 8) N/A Significantly higher levels after treatment with 0.5% ECVC (with or without nicotine) vs. controls. (39)
 Neutrophils ELISA (R&D Systems) and western blot Never-smokers (n = 10) N/A Significantly higher levels after 6-h exposure to 0.003% ECVE vs. controls. (40)
IFNγ
 Urine XL Cytokine Discovery Magnetic Luminex Panel (R&D Systems) Nonsmokers (n = 26);
E-cig users (n = 22).
N/A Significantly higher levels in e-cig users vs. nonsmokers. (6)
 BALF V-PLEX Plus Proinflammatory Combo 10 Panel (Meso Scale Discovery) Never-smokers (n = 42);
E-cig users (n = 15);
Smokers (n = 16).
Means ± SD = 0.91 ± 0.27 pg/mL
Means ± SD = 0.74 ± 0.31 pg/mL
Means ± SD = 0.65 ± 0.33 pg/mL
Significantly higher levels in never-smokers vs. e-cig users.Significantly higher levels in e-cig users vs. smokers. (7)
TNFα
 Alveolar macrophages ELISA (Biotechne) Never-smokers (n = 8) N/A Significantly higher levels after treatment with 0.5% ECVC (with nicotine) vs. controls. (39)
Neutrophil elastase (NE)
 BALF Western blot normalized to albumin Nonsmokers (n = 14);
E-cig users (n = 14);
Smokers (n = 14).
N/A Significantly higher levels in both e-cig users and smokers vs. nonsmokers. (2)
 Neutrophils Florescence (FLUOstar omega plate reader (BMG Labtech) Never-smokers (n = 10) N/A Significantly higher levels after 6-h exposure to 0.003% ECVE vs. controls. (40)
Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing caspase activation and recruitment domain (ASC)
 BALF ELISA Never-smokers (n = 12);
E-cig users (n = 15);
Smokers (n = 16).
Med = 11, IQR = 9–15 ng/mL
Med = 22, IQR = 14–35 ng/mL
Med = 37, IQR = 21–64 ng/mL
Significantly higher levels in both e-cig users and smokers vs. nonsmokers. (37)
Caspase-1
 BALF ELISA Never-smokers (n = 12);
E-cig users (n = 15);
Smokers (n = 16).
Med = 12, IQR = 6-14 pg/mL
Med = 16, IQR = 9-35 pg/mL
Med = 42, IQR = 27-68 pg/mL
Significantly higher levels in smokers vs. both e-cig users and nonsmokers. (37)
Oxidative stress, DNA damage, and lipid peroxidation biomarkers
8-Isoprostane
 Urine ELISA Nonsmokers (n = 26);
E-cig users (n = 22).
N/A Significantly higher levels in e-cig users vs. nonsmokers. (6)
 Spot urine ELISA (R&D) Nonsmokers (n = 20);
E-cig users (n = 20);
Smokers (n = 13).
Means ± SD = 411.2 ± 287.4 pg/mg creatinine
Means ± SD = 750.8 ± 433 pg/mg creatinineMeans ± SD = 784.2 ± 546.1 pg/mg creatinine
Significantly higher levels in e-cig users vs. nonsmokers.No significant difference between e-cig users and smokers. (4)
8-OHdG
 Urine HT 8-Oxo-dG Human ELISA (Trevigen) Nonsmokers (n = 26);
E-cig users (n = 22).
N/A Significantly higher levels in e-cig users vs. nonsmokers. (6)
 Spot urine DNA Damage (8-OHdG) ELISA Kit (Stress Marq Biosciences) Nonsmokers (n = 20);
E-cig users (n = 20);
Smokers (n = 13).
Means ± SD = 221.6 ± 157.8 ng/mg creatinine
Means ± SD = 442.8 ± 300.7 ng/mg creatinine
Means ± SD = 388 ± 235 ng/mg creatinine
Significantly higher levels in e-cig users vs. nonsmokers.No significant difference between e-cig users and smokers. (4)
ROS
 Alveolar macrophages DCFDA assay (Abcam) Never-smokers (n = 8) 50-fold increase in ECVC treated AM (with or without nicotine) vs. untreated controls Significantly higher levels after treatment with 0.5% ECVC (with or without nicotine) vs. controls. (39)
MDA
 Plasma Colorimetric lipid peroxidation assay (Oxford Biomedical Research) Smokers switch to e-cigs (n = 42);
Smokers switch to dual use (n = 24);
Smoker controls (no switch; n = 20).
1.12 ± 0.1 (prior); 1.01 ± 0.1 (1 mo) nmol/L1.28 ± 0.1 (prior); 1.09 ± 0.1 (1 mo) nmol/L1.12 ± 0.3 (prior); 1.15 ± 0.2 (1 mo) nmol/L Significant decrease in smokers who switched to e-cigs or dual use (cigarettes and e-cigs) for 1 mo relative to BSL. No change in smoker controls. (20)
CC16
 Serum N/A Occasional smokers (n = 23); Vape session: Sham vape session: 0.51 (BSL)–0.64 (post) µg/mg creatinine0.63 (BSL)–0.49 (post) µg/mg creatinine E-cig use significantly increased median levels relative to BSL after 30 min e-cig use vs. sham vaping. (43)
 Serum Latex immunoassay using rabbit anti-CC16 antibody Smokers (n = 25) Vape session (nicotine): Vape session (no nicotine): Sham vape session: Δ: +1.2 ± 0.3 µg/L (after vaping-BSL)
Δ: +1.1 ± 0.3 µg/L (after vaping-BSL)
Δ: −0.5 ± 0.2 µg/L (after vaping-BSL)
E-cig use significantly increased means ± SE levels relative to BSL after 30 min e-cig use (with or without nicotine) vs. sham vaping. (44)
EVALI-specific biomarkers: vitamin E acetate (VEA)
 BALF Isotope dilution mass spectrometry EVALI patients (n = 51);
Nonusers (n = 52);
E-cig users (n = 18);
Smokers (n = 29)
present in 48/51;present in 0/52; present in 0/18; present in 0/29 VEA present in most EVALI samples but not in any e-cig user, smoker or nonuser samples. (45)
Transcriptomic/gene expression biomarkers
 Bronchial brushings GeneChip Human Transcriptome Array 2.0 (Affymetrix) Never-smokers (n = 42);
E-cig users (n = 15);
Smokers (n = 16).
181 DETs unique to e-cig users 2,452 DETs among groups (for 2,093 genes) (7)
 Oral cells RNA-seq Nonsmokers (n = 27);
E-cig users (n = 42);
Smokers (n = 24).
∼50% more DETs than e-cig users Significant numbers of DETs in both e-cig users and smokers vs. nonsmokers. (27)
 SAEAlveolar Macrophages TruSeq v2 mRNA library prep RNA-sequencing (2 × 125 bp) (Illumina HiSeq. 2500) Never-smokers (n = 10) given e-cig with nicotine (n = 7) or without nicotine (n = 3). 71 significantly altered genes vs. BSL; 65 significantly altered genes vs. BSL;27 significantly altered genes vs. BSL; 61 significantly altered genes vs. BSL For both groups, significantly altered pathways were associated with nicotine receptors and downstream p53 targets.No standard pathways identified in alveolar macrophages. (59)
 Primary HBECs GeneChip Human Gene 1.0 ST Array (Affymetrix) Nonsmoker (donor; n); E-cig aerosol exposure; Cig smoke exposure; Air (control). 546 genes significantly differentially expressed among the three groups;493 genes differentially expressed between tobacco and menthol e-cig vapor. Genes altered in both e-cig and smoke groups associated with cilium assembly/movement, apoptosis, xenobiotic and oxidative stress, and DNA damage pathways.Genes altered uniquely in e-cig group associated with cell division and cell cycle regulation pathways. (60)
 Primary NHBEs RNA-seqResults relative to H2O controls Diacetyl (2,3-butanedione), 2,3-pentanedione. 163 differentially expressed genes;568 differentially expressed genes Differentially expressed genes associated with cytoskeletal- and cilia-related pathways. (24)
 Differentiated HBECs RNA-seq (Illumina)Results relative to air controls Nonsmokers (donors; n = 2);
E-cig vapor exposure; Cig smoke exposure; Air (control).
57 differentially expressed genes (1 h);49 differentially expressed genes (0 h) Genes altered uniquely in e-cig group associated with the cell cycle, response to hypoxia, response to organic substances, apoptosis and acute inflammatory response. (61)
 Nasal epithelium biopsies RNA-seqResults relative to nonsmokers Nonsmokers (n = 13);
E-cig users (n = 12);
Smokers (n = 14).
358 genes significantly downregulated;53 genes significantly downregulated All 53 genes downregulated in smokers were also downregulated in e-cig users. (62)
Exosomal small RNAs as circulating biomarkers
 Plasma-derived exosomes RNA-seq (Illumina NextSeq. 500)Results relative to non-smokers Non-smokers (n = 8);
E-cig users (n = 7);Cigarette smokers (n = 7); Waterpipe smokers (n = 7); Dual smokers (n = 7).
17 miRNAs, 7 tRNAs and 5 piRNAs differentially expressed in e-cig users 13 miRNAs were significantly upregulated, and 4 miRNAs were significantly downregulated in e-cig users compared to non-smokers. (64)
DNA methylation biomarkers
 Bronchial brushings Infinium Methylation EPIC BeadChip (Illumina) Never-smokers (n = 10);
E-cig users (n = 12);
Smokers (n = 10).
14 unique CpGs differentially expressed 451 differentially methylated CpGs (273 genes) among the three groups. (7)
 Peripheral blood leukocytes DNA methylation LINE-1 kit (Active motif)RNA-seq Results relative to nonsmokers Nonsmokers (n = 15);
E-cig users (n = 15);
Smokers (n = 15).
18% hypomethylation in LINE1 elements;13% hypomethylation in LINE1 elements No significant difference in levels of LINE-1 hypomethylation between smokers and e-cig users. (23)
Proteomic biomarkers
 Bronchial brush biopsies LC-MS/MSResults relative to nonsmokers Nonsmokers (n = 8);
E-cig users (n = 9);
Smokers (n = 9).
191 differentially expressed proteins;292 differentially expressed proteins 78 proteins similarly altered in vapers and smokers.131 proteins exclusively altered in vapers.14 uniquely altered pathways in vapers. (48)
 Induced sputum Q-Exactive mass spectrometer coupled to UltiMate 3000 nano HPLC system (Thermo Scientific). Never-smokers (n = 15);
E-cig users (n = 15);
Smokers (n = 14).
5 significantly upregulated proteins;66 significantly upregulated proteins;23 significantly upregulated proteins 15 proteins commonly upregulated in smokers and vapers.∼81 proteins significantly altered in e-cig users relative to never-smokers, 44 in smokers relative to never-smokers. (17)
MUC5AC
 Induced sputum Stable-isotope-labeled mass spectrometry with parallel reaction monitoring analysis Never-smokers (n = 15);
E-cig users (n = 15);
Smokers (n = 14).
Means ± SD = 15 ± 6 pmol/mL;
Means ± SD = 58 ± 21 pmol/mL;
Means ± SD = 132 ± 58 pmol/mL
Significantly higher levels in both e-cig users and smokers vs. nonsmokers. (17)

BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; BSL, baseline; CpGs, CpG sites; DETs, differentially expressed transcripts; ECVC, e-cigarette vapor condensate; ECVE, e-cig vapor extract; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; EVALI, e-cigarette or vaping-associated lung disease; HBECs, human bronchial epithelial cells; IQR, interquartile range; LC-NSI-HRMS/MS, liquid chromatography-nanoelectrospray ionization-high resolution tandem mass spectrometry; med, median; N/A, details not available; NHBEs, normal human bronchial epithelial cells; SAE, small airway epithelium; SD, standard deviation.