Skip to main content
. 2000 Mar;21(3):524–531.

fig 3.

fig 3.

LR for IPS of individual participants • of the pAD and control groups. The mean LR □ for each group was significantly different (P < .02, unpaired two-tailed t test). The other regions of interest (PFC, SEF, FEF) did not show significant separations (not shown)