Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 3.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Sci. 2017 May 30;21(3):e12575. doi: 10.1111/desc.12575

TABLE 1.

Demographic characteristics of participants in Experiment 1A

Deaf native signers
n = 29
Deaf CI users
n = 11
Hearing controls
n = 31
F/X2 p
Age .94 .39
Mean yr;mo 9;06 9;09 9;03
(SD) (1;09) (1;11) (1;04)
Range 7;01–12;10 7;04–12;10 7;0–12;11
Sex (f: m) 19: 10 4: 7 16: 15 3.01 .22
Hearing status Severe or profound congenital deafness Severe or profound congenital deafness No known hearing impairment n/a n/a
Language experience Exposure to sign language at home from birth and at school; variable speech emphasis at home and school. Little accessible language input prior to cochlear implant; listening and spoken language emphasis at home and school. Exposure to spoken language from birth. n/a n/a
Age of CIa: (4 of 29) (11 of 11) n/a n/a n/a
Mean yr;mo 1;10 1;04
(SD) (0;04) (0;09)
Range l;07–2;03 0;08–2;10
Primary caregiver education levelb I: 1 I: 0 I: 0 .96
II: 2 II: 1 II: 1
III: 6 III: 2 III: 6
IV: 8 IV: 3 IV: 9
V: 14 V: 5 V: 14
VI: 0 VI: 0 VI: 1
a

Only 4/29 (14%) of the Deaf native signers received a cochlear implant; they are included with the other Deaf native signers rather than with the CI users because they were exposed to ASL from birth.

b

Education level: I = less than high school, II = high school or GED, III = some college or associate’s degree; IV = bachelors degree; V = some graduate school or advanced degree. VI: Not reported.