Skip to main content
. 2021 May 20;6:621646. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.621646

Table 2.

Descriptive and comparative analysis, according to sex, of the Scale of Myths of Romantic Love.

Women Men
n= 837 n= 371
M SD M SD t p d C.I. 95% Cohen's d
D1 1.92 1.24 1.96 1.21 −0.46 0.649 0.03 −0.09–0.15
D2 2.32 1.30 2.58 1.34 −3.26 0.002* 0.20 0.08–0.32
D3 2.10 1.21 2.04 1.20 0.85 0.398 0.05 −0.07 to 0.18
D4 1.36 0.78 1.45 0.84 −1.83 0.068 0.11 −0.01 to 0.24
D5 2.95 1.24 2.92 1.32 0.45 0.650 0.03 −0.09 to 0.15
D6 1.65 0.97 1.67 0.95 −0.31 0.758 0.02 −0.10 to 0.14
D7 2.93 1.27 2.98 1.33 −0.69 0.492 0.04 −0.08 to 0.16
D8 2.93 1.38 2.77 1.38 1.89 0.059 0.12 −0.01–0.24
D9 3.02 1.33 2.85 1.34 2.02 0.044* 0.13 0.01–0.25
D10 2.04 1.16 2.25 1.22 −2.88 0.004* 0.18 0.06–0.30
D11 1.59 1.01 1.89 1.21 −4.19 <0.001** 0.28 0.16–0.40
D12 2.63 1.35 2.48 1.39 1.78 0.075 0.11 −0.01 to 0.23
Myths Scale 2.29 0.71 2.32 0.74 −0.74 0.460 0.04 −0.01–0.16
Factor 1 2.50 0.85 2.46 0.88 0.85 0.394 0.01 −0.08 to 0.17
Factor 2 1.99 0.73 2.13 0.82 −2.91 0.004* 0.18 0.06–0.31
*

p <0.05;

**

<0.001 Factor 1: exclusiveness; Factor 2: better half.

Source: Authors' own creation.