Table 3.

Descriptive and comparative analysis, according to sexual orientation, of the Scale of Myths of Romantic Love.

	Heterosexual		Homosexual		Bisexual		Other
	n= 742		n= 113		n= 290		n= 63
	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD	F	p	η2	C.I. 95% η2
D1	2.14	1.30	1.91	1.15	1.52	0.96	1.43	0.89	22.69	<0.001**	0.05	0.03–0.08
D2	2.50	1.32	2.56	1.38	2.15	1.26	2.00	1.30	7.65	<0.001**	0.02	0.01–0.03
D3	2.34	1.23	1.99	1.20	1.61	1.00	1.48	0.93	34.25	<0.001**	0.08	0.05–0.11
D4	1.45	0.85	1.47	0.78	1.24	0.69	1.14	0.40	7.28	<0.001**	0.02	0.00–0.03
D5	3.18	1.21	2.73	1.25	2.52	1.25	2.40	1.26	26.65	<0.001**	0.06	0.04–0.09
D6	1.83	1.01	1.63	0.93	1.34	0.80	1.16	0.60	25.21	<0.001**	0.06	0.03–0.08
D7	3.13	1.23	2.99	1.31	2.57	1.30	2.33	1.33	19.14	<0.001**	0.05	0.02–0.07
D8	3.13	1.23	2.85	1.34	2.25	1.20	1.98	1.20	48.40	<0.001**	0.11	0.08–0.14
D9	3.22	1.30	3.12	1.27	2.41	1.22	2.21	1.32	35.90	<0.001**	0.08	0.05–0.11
D10	2.25	1.19	2.26	1.33	1.77	1.02	1.67	1.12	15.42	<0.001**	0.04	0.02–0.06
D11	1.81	1.15	1.74	1.24	1.43	0.91	1.24	0.62	12.36	<0.001**	0.03	0.01–0.05
D12	2.73	1.34	2.64	1.42	2.26	1.30	2.27	1.44	9.96	<0.001**	0.02	0.01–0.04
Myths Scale	2.48	0.69	2.32	0.78	1.92	0.60	1.78	0.53	61.82	<0.001**	0.13	0.10–0.17
Factor 1	2.72	0.83	2.46	0.89	2.03	0.71	1.85	0.65	66.10	<0.001**	0.14	0.11–0.18
Factor 2	2.15	0.77	2.13	0.84	1.77	0.65	1.66	0.65	24.06	<0.001**	0.06	0.03–0.08

^**p <0.001; Factor 1: exclusiveness; Factor 2: better half.

Source: Authors' own creation.