Table 4.

Descriptive and comparative analysis, according to type of relationship, of the Scale of Myths of Romantic Love.

	Monogamous		Consensual		Unrelated
	n= 734		Non- monogamous n= 399		n= 75
	M	SD	M	SD	M	SD	F	p	η2	C.I. 95% η2
D1	2.17	1.29	1.38	0.84	2.60	1.28	73.43	<0.001**	0.11	0.08–0.14
D2	2.55	1.34	2.04	1.21	2.79	1.32	23.782	<0.001**	0.04	0.09–0.06
D3	2.37	1.22	1.46	0.84	2.56	1.37	91.98	<0.001**	0.13	0.10–0.17
D4	1.46	0.83	1.22	0.67	1.57	0.93	14.64	<0.001**	0.02	0.01–0.04
D5	3.20	1.20	2.45	1.21	3.04	1.38	48.57	<0.001**	0.07	0.05–0.10
D6	1.88	1.05	1.24	0.61	1.68	0.98	61.41	<0.001**	0.09	0.06–0.12
D7	3.19	1.23	2.46	1.23	3.11	1.32	44.827	<0.001**	0.07	0.04–0.10
D8	3.36	1.27	1.91	1.01	3.37	1.31	198.23	<0.001**	0.25	0.21–0.29
D9	3.40	1.21	2.15	1.16	3.11	1.29	140.79	<0.001**	0.19	0.15–0.23
D10	2.30	1.22	1.71	1.02	2.28	1.18	33.95	<0.001**	0.05	0.03–0.08
D11	1.74	1.11	1.56	1.04	1.71	1.02	3.64	0.027*	0.01	0.0–0.02
D12	2.74	1.36	2.26	1.34	2.79	1.23	17.91	<0.001**	0.03	0.01–0.05
Myths Scale	2.53	0.69	1.82	0.53	2.55	0.66	165.90	<0.001**	0.22	0.18–0.25
Factor 1	2.80	0.80	1.86	0.62	2.78	0.79	209.12	<0.001**	0.26	0.22–0.30
Factor 2	2.16	0.77	1.76	0.68	2.22	0.68	40.92	<0.001**	0.06	0.04–0.09

^*p <0.05;

^**p <0.001; Factor 1: exclusiveness; Factor 2: better half.

Source: Authors' own creation.