Skip to main content
. 2021 May 20;6:621646. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.621646

Table 6.

Post-hoc factorial ANOVA analysis for the dependent variable of global romantic love myths score and its two factors, considering the type of relationship as a grouping variable.

Variable Contrast N M SD Mean difference SE p d C.I. 95% Cohen's d
Myths scale Monogamous No monogamous 734 399 2.53 1.82 0.69 0.53 0.71 0.04 <0.001** 1.11 0.98–1.24
Monogamous Unrelated 734 75 2.53 2.55 0.69 0.66 −002 0.07 0.962 0.03 −0.27–0.21
No monogamous Unrelated 399 75 1.82 2.55 0.53 0.66 −0.73 0.08 <0.001** 1.32 1.06–1.58
Factor 1 Monogamous No monogamous 734 399 2.80 1.86 0.80 0.62 0.93 0.04 <0.001** 1.27 1.13–1.40
Monogamous Unrelated 734 75 2.80 2.78 0.80 0.79 0.01 0.09 0.986 0.03 −0.21–0.26
No monogamous Unrelated 399 75 1.86 2.78 0.62 0.79 −0.92 0.09 <0.001** 1.42 1.15–1.68
Factor 2 Monogamous No monogamous 734 399 2.16 1.76 0.77 0.68 0.40 0.05 <0.001** 0.54 0.42–0.66
Monogamous Unrelated 734 75 2.16 2.22 0.77 0.68 −0.07 0.09 0.724 0.08 −1.16–0.32
No monogamous Unrelated 399 75 1.76 2.22 0.68 0.68 −0.47 0.09 <0.001** 0,68 0,42–0,93

Adjusted p-values: Tukey Method;

**

P <0.001; Factor 1: exclusiveness; Factor 2: better half.

Source: Authors' own creation.