Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 13;31(7):2994–3004. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05341-w

Table 2.

Postoperative outcome at 1 year in the study population and comparison of outcomes between RYGB and SG groups

Variable ALL (n=760) RYGB (n=259) SG (n=501) p-value
Weight, kg 94.79 (19.00) 96.79 (17.00) 92.79 (17.00) 0.0006
BMI, kg/m2 32.82±5.76 33.59±5.40 32.42±5.90 0.002
WL, % 28.02±11.89 26.82±11.30 28.64±12.15 0.045
EWL, % 62.56 (33.49) 58.06 (30.46) 65.55 (26.59) 0.007
>50% EWL 523 (68.82) 169 (65.25) 354 (70.66) <0.0001
EBMIL, % 62.56 (33.49) 58.06 (30.46) 65.55 (26.59) 0.007

Data are shown as mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range) for continuous variables and as number (percentage) for categorical variables

p-values refer to the comparison between RYGB and SG groups with the use of an independent t test or Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and Chi-square test with Fisher’s correction for categorical variables

Embolden p-values indicate statistically significant result

Abbreviations: RYGB Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, SG sleeve gastrectomy, BMI body mass index, WL weight loss, EWL excess weight loss, EBMIL excess body mass index loss